Autonomy Score Calculation Using Pecuniary Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Calculating a user's autonomy score has long been challenging due to the complexity of evaluating monetary resources and proficiency, which existing methods fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing a processor and memory to generate a pecuniary plan, evaluate pecuniary proficiency using a machine learning model trained on pecuniary data, and determine an autonomy score based on proficiency and status, incorporating pecuniary machine learning models and fuzzy inference systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to calculate autonomy score, then the calculation process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of the autonomy score assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomy score assessment accuracyVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomy score calculation is divided into multiple independent components: pecuniary datum processing, pecuniary plan generation, pecuniary proficiency evaluation, and autonomy score computation. Each component is handled by separate processing modules, allowing the system to maintain high accuracy through specialized processing while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A pecuniary machine learning model is introduced as an intermediary between raw pecuniary data and the final autonomy score. This intermediary layer processes and transforms financial data into meaningful proficiency assessments, significantly improving measurement precision while encapsulating complexity within the model itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If detailed pecuniary data analysis is performed to improve assessment accuracy, then the reliability of autonomy score increases, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomy score reliabilityVSAvoidcalculation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates pecuniary plans and evaluates pecuniary proficiency in advance, before computing the final autonomy score. This preliminary processing organizes and pre-evaluates financial data, allowing the final autonomy score calculation to be performed quickly while maintaining high reliability through thorough prior analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The pecuniary machine learning model transforms complex financial parameters into simplified proficiency metrics. By changing the parameter representation from raw financial data to standardized proficiency scores, the system achieves high reliability through detailed analysis while reducing processing time for the final autonomy calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11816729B1Apparatus for producing an autonomy score and a method for its use
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 GRAVYSTACK INC
  • US11816729B1 patent drawing
  • US11816729B1 patent drawing
  • US11816729B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for producing an autonomy score is disclosed. The apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor. The memory instructs the processor to receive a pecuniary datum. The memory additionally instructs the processor to generate a pecuniary plan as a function of the pecuniary datum. The memory then instructs the processor to evaluate a pecuniary proficiency of a user as a function of the pecuniary plan. A pecuniary machine learning model is configured to be trained using a pecuniary training data. The pecuniary proficiency of a user is then evaluated as a function of the pecuniary plan. The memory then instructs the processor to produce an autonomy score as a function of the pecuniary proficiency. The memory finally instructs the processor to determine a pecuniary status of a user as a function of the pecuniary proficiency and the autonomy score.