Remote Electric Aircraft Autopilot Authority Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric aircraft autopilot systems lack the ability to prevent unsafe user inputs and ensure compliance with regulations, such as avoiding excessive pitch or flying in restricted airspace, during remote pilot control operations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for remote pilot control of electric aircraft in autopilot mode, where a flight controller receives user input, determines the authority status, and generates a command datum to manage aircraft operations, including warnings and instructions, ensuring safe and regulatory-compliant flight conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the autopilot system fully automates aircraft control, then operational efficiency is improved, but user safety control and regulatory compliance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiduser safety control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary authority determination mechanism that mediates between fully automated autopilot control and direct user control. The flight controller acts as a mediator that receives user inputs, determines authority status based on safety and regulatory criteria, and selectively applies or blocks control commands. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining automated efficiency while inserting a safety layer that ensures user control and compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring user inputs against predetermined safety and regulatory criteria, then providing feedback through authority determination. The flight controller evaluates each control input, determines whether the user has authority to execute it based on real-time flight conditions and regulatory constraints, and communicates this determination back to the control system. This feedback loop ensures safety and compliance while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the system allows full user control input, then ease of operation is improved, but unsafe actions and regulatory violations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control inputVSAvoidunsafe actions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by establishing predetermined safety and regulatory criteria before user inputs are executed. The system proactively defines boundary conditions for safe and compliant operations, then uses these pre-established criteria to evaluate and potentially block user control inputs that would violate safety requirements or regulations. This prevents unsafe actions before they occur while maintaining ease of operation for legitimate controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The flight controller serves as an intermediary that stands between the user control interface and the aircraft's flight control surfaces. It receives user inputs, evaluates them against safety and regulatory criteria, and selectively transmits or blocks commands. This intermediary layer maintains ease of operation by allowing free user input while preventing harmful actions through intelligent filtering based on predetermined criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the flight controller implements comprehensive safety checks and regulatory compliance monitoring, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and compliance assuranceVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-functionality by designing the flight controller to perform multiple functions within a single integrated system. The same flight controller that manages basic autopilot operations also performs authority determination, safety criterion evaluation, regulatory compliance monitoring, and selective command blocking. This universal approach improves reliability through comprehensive safety checks while avoiding the complexity of adding separate dedicated safety systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges safety monitoring, regulatory compliance checking, and flight control functions into a unified authority determination process within the flight controller. Rather than implementing separate complex safety systems, the patent combines these functions by integrating authority determination logic directly into the existing flight control architecture, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11542003B1Systems and methods for remote pilot control of an electric aircraft
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 BETA AIR LLC
  • US11542003B1 patent drawing
  • US11542003B1 patent drawing
  • US11542003B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for remote pilot control of an electric aircraft in autopilot mode including a remote computing device configured to receive a user input and generate a control datum as a function of the pilot input, a flight controller configured to receive the control datum from the remote computing device, and generate a command datum as a function of the control datum and an authority status, and the remote computing device configured to receive the command datum from the flight controller, and display the command datum.