Aircraft Autopilot Compensation for Nonlinear Spoiler Roll Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft autopilot control systems face instability due to nonlinearities in mechanical linkages and spoiler deployment, leading to unwanted rolling moments and oscillations, which existing compensation methods fail to adequately address without introducing significant time delays or negating the benefits of existing roll spoiler systems.

Innovation Solution

An autopilot nonlinear compensation method and system that determine a ratio of desired to total aerodynamic moments, adjusting the autopilot command with a corrective signal to stabilize the aircraft, using a combination of sensors and flight controllers to predict and compensate for nonlinearities in control surface positions and moments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If existing compensation methods are used to address nonlinearities, then stability is improved, but significant time delays are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautopilot stabilityVSAvoidcompensation time delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by predicting the pilot interface position and calculating the ratio of desired to total aerodynamic moments in advance, before the nonlinear effects fully manifest. This allows the corrective command to be applied proactively, reducing the effective time delay in stabilizing the autopilot system while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If roll spoilers are disabled or reshaped to achieve linearity, then nonlinear oscillations are reduced, but the benefits of existing roll spoiler systems are negated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll control stabilityVSAvoidspoiler system functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by continuously monitoring the measured pilot interface position and using it to calculate the ratio of desired to total aerodynamic moments. This feedback loop enables real-time correction of nonlinear effects without modifying the physical spoiler system, preserving its full functionality while achieving roll control stability through software-based compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-generated harmful factors

If mechanical linkages and spoiler deployment are modified to eliminate nonlinearities, then unwanted rolling moments are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunwanted rolling momentsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical modifications with a computational approach. Instead of physically modifying linkages or spoilers to eliminate nonlinearities, the system uses software algorithms to calculate and compensate for the nonlinear effects in real-time, reducing unwanted rolling moments without increasing mechanical system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10969796B2Autopilot nonlinear compensation
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10969796B2 patent drawing
  • US10969796B2 patent drawing
  • US10969796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autopilot nonlinear compensation method includes providing an autopilot command for executing an aircraft maneuver, determining a desired aerodynamic moment of the aircraft based on the autopilot command, providing a measured pilot interface position, determining a total aerodynamic moment of the aircraft based on the measured pilot interface position and the autopilot command in combination with the desired aerodynamic moment, determining a ratio of the desired aerodynamic moment to the total aerodynamic moment, and adjusting the autopilot command with a corrective command based on the ratio. The method may be used to stabilize autopilot control of an aircraft following nonlinear deployment of a control surface.