Autorack Deck Height Adjustment Drive Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern autorack railroad cars face challenges in efficiently adjusting deck heights to accommodate different levels of automotive vehicles, leading to limitations in loading and unloading capacity and operational flexibility.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a deck height adjustment drive transmission system with threaded output shafts and a counterbalance apparatus allows for independent operation of multiple decks, enabling bi-level and tri-level configurations while minimizing static loading and maintaining a constant space envelope during motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple decks are adjusted independently to accommodate different vehicle levels, then loading and unloading capacity improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading and unloading capacityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive transmission system is segmented into multiple independent arrays of threaded output shafts, with each array dedicated to controlling a specific deck's height. This allows each deck to be adjusted independently while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design, where each segment (deck drive array) can be operated and maintained separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The drive transmission system is designed with universal components that can serve multiple decks. The same type of threaded output shafts and drive mechanisms are used across different deck arrays, allowing a single design solution to handle multiple functions (containing both bi-level and tri-level configurations) without requiring entirely separate systems for each deck.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If deck height adjustment mechanism is added, then operational flexibility improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The deck structure transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic, adjustable system. Threaded output shafts enable the decks to move vertically to different heights, providing operational flexibility. The dynamic adjustment capability allows the same structure to serve multiple loading configurations (bi-level, tri-level, or single-level) without requiring separate manufactured structures for each configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If counterbalance apparatus is used to minimize static loading, then force required to move decks decreases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce required to move decksVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A counterbalance apparatus is integrated into the deck support structure, using counterweights to offset the gravitational force on the decks. This reduces the net force required to move the decks vertically, making the adjustment operation easier and requiring less powerful drive mechanisms. The counterbalance system works in conjunction with the threaded output shafts to provide controlled, low-force deck movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the flexibility and efficiency of deck adjustments, allowing for seamless transitions between bi-level and tri-level configurations, reducing the need for frequent rack replacements and improving operational efficiency by minimizing the force required to move decks.

Implementation Method 1

The deck height adjustment drive transmission has a first array of threaded output shafts mounted to drive motion of the first height-adjustable deck; and a second array of threaded output shafts mounted to drive motion of the second height-adjustable deck

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreaded mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

there is a combination of the deck height adjustment transmission and a deck counterbalance apparatus, the counterbalance apparatus is mounted to react the weight of the height-adjustable decks, and the deck height adjustment transmission is free of deck weight static loading

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounterbalance: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10377392B2Autorack railroad car having convertible deck structure
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 NATIONAL STEEL CAR
  • US10377392B2 patent drawing
  • US10377392B2 patent drawing
  • US10377392B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autorack railroad car has decks that are movably reconfigurable between tri-level and bi-level configurations. They are also movable to permit greater vertical clearance room for loading the main deck. The decks may be constrained to a single degree of freedom of motion, namely in the vertical direction, by guides that run along the vertical side posts of the car. The decks may include a passive counterbalance transmission linking the mid-level and upper level decks, such that the decks counterbalance each other when the decks are moved between the various positions. There is a separate, independent drive provided to move the decks. The drive may include scissor jacks. More than one scissor jack may share a common drive axis and shafting arrangement. The drive is operable from a trackside accessible drive distribution point. A secondary lock system is provided to prevent the decks from moving inopportunely.