Autosampler Sample Tracking for Vial Position and Workflow Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for tracking and managing samples in scientific instruments suffer from human errors, inability to track vial positions, and selection of incompatible workflows, leading to potential mishandling and incorrect experiments.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a scientific instrument support module with sample manager logic, autosampler application logic, and experiment manager logic to automate sample tracking, vial position verification, and workflow management, using graphical user interfaces for user interaction and data validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tracking and management of samples is used, then device complexity is reduced, but human errors occur and reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample tracking accuracyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated tracking where the scientific instrument autonomously monitors sample containers, detects unique identifiers, and tracks positions without human intervention. The instrument self-manages the tracking data and generates alerts for mismatches, eliminating manual tracking operations while ensuring high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tracking operations with an automated electronic detection and data processing system. The scientific instrument uses detectors to scan unique identifiers and automatically records position information, substituting human manual tracking with electronic automation to improve reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If automated tracking system is implemented, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample tracking accuracyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Thescientific instrument performs multiple functions: it conducts scientific analysis, tracks sample container positions, detects unique identifiers, and generates alerts for mismatches. By integrating these diverse functions into a single universal system, the patent avoids adding separate dedicated tracking equipment, thereby limiting the increase in overall device complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If vial position tracking is not implemented, then device complexity is low, but productivity decreases due to inability to detect positioning errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample processing efficiencyVSAvoidposition verification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the actual position of sample containers and comparing it with the expected position stored in memory. When a mismatch is detected, the system generates an alert to notify the user, enabling immediate correction of positioning errors and preventing wasted processing time, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification of sample container positions before scientific analysis begins. By checking position matching in advance and alerting users to mismatches before processing starts, the system prevents wasted time and resources on incorrect samples, improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If workflow compatibility verification is not implemented, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to incompatible experiments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperiment compatibilityVSAvoidworkflow verification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by comparing the detected unique identifier with stored workflow information and alerting the user when incompatibility is detected. This feedback mechanism ensures that only compatible workflows are executed, maintaining high reliability while using a relatively simple alert-based approach rather than complex automated blocking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12555056B2Sample tracking workflow and method
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 DIONEX CORP
  • US12555056B2 patent drawing
  • US12555056B2 patent drawing
  • US12555056B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are scientific instrument support systems, as well as related methods, computing devices, and computer-readable media. For example, in some embodiments, samples are tracked using unique identifiers. An autosampler may detect the samples using unique identifiers and provide alerts when the sample is placed in the wrong location or when an incorrect or incompatible workflow is selected for the sample.