AUV Sonar Classification With Mission-Adaptive Program Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sonar systems face challenges in accurately classifying underwater objects due to false alarms from natural echoes, environmental complexities, and the need for efficient, adaptive classification programs that can operate autonomously on unmanned underwater vehicles (AUVs) without extensive computational resources.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing polynomial chaos expansion and item response theory to calculate suitability and error values for minehunting classification programs, selecting the most suitable program based on mission parameters and environmental conditions, ensuring rapid deployment and minimal knowledge exposure in case of AUV loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple classification programs are stored on the AUV for different mission scenarios, then the adaptability to various environmental conditions is improved, but the device complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to environmental conditionsVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a lightweight suitability calculation mechanism that can be executed with limited computational resources on the AUV. Instead of requiring complex offline analysis or extensive training data, the system uses simple polynomial chaos expansion and item response theory calculations that can be performed rapidly with minimal computational overhead, enabling the AUV to evaluate and switch between classification programs dynamically during missions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The AUV autonomously performs suitability calculations for different classification programs based on current mission parameters and environmental conditions. The system self-evaluates which classification program is most appropriate without requiring external intervention or complex decision-making infrastructure, thereby reducing operational complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If extensive training data is used to improve classification accuracy, then the measurement precision is improved, but the loss of time for data processing and the device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates suitability metrics using polynomial chaos expansion and item response theory during system setup or previous missions. These pre-computed suitability values and their relationships to mission parameters are stored and can be rapidly retrieved and applied during actual operations, eliminating the need for time-consuming real-time training or extensive data processing during critical missions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the classification problem from requiring extensive training data to using parametric models (polynomial chaos expansion and item response theory) that describe the relationship between mission parameters and classification program performance. This parametric approach allows accurate predictions with minimal data while significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the AUV carries comprehensive classification programs for all possible scenarios, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity and knowledge exposure risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoidprogram storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic program selection mechanism where the AUV evaluates the suitability of different classification programs based on current mission parameters and environmental conditions. Instead of statically carrying all possible programs with equal weight, the system dynamically determines which programs are most appropriate for the current situation, maintaining reliability while reducing the effective complexity and knowledge exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The suitability calculation mechanism acts as an intermediary between the available classification programs and the mission requirements. This intermediary evaluates and ranks programs based on polynomial chaos expansion and item response theory, selecting the most suitable program without requiring the AUV to deeply process or expose all underlying program knowledge, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing complexity and security risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4474862B1Method for classifying underwater objects and associated computer program product
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 EHLERS FRANK
  • EP4474862B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4474862B1 patent drawing
  • EP4474862B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for classifying underwater objects (40), having the following features: a) the method uses an unmanned underwater vehicle, which is referred to below as AUV (10) and has a sonar device (12) connected to an AUV computer (11), and a mother ship computer (21) of a mother ship (20), which communicates on the one hand with the AUV computer (11) and on the other hand with a data center (30), b) during a classification mission, the AUV computer (11) classifies underwater objects (40) using a mine hunting classification program from sonar raw data sections of the sonar device (12), c) the mother ship (20) transmits at least one mission parameter value and an associated standard deviation value of at least one mission parameter from each of the following groups to the data center before a classification mission: • group with mission parameters of the seabed,• Group with mission parameters of the underwater objects to be detected, • Group with mission parameters of the sea area, • Group with mission parameters of the operational task, d) the data center has access to the respective program source code of several mine-hunting classification programs, e) the data center calculates a suitability value and an error value for each of the several mine-hunting classification programs using a calculation program with the tools of a polynomial chaos expansion and an item response theory, based on the transmitted mission parameter values ​​and associated standard deviation values ​​and based on the respective program source code, f) the AUV (10) uses the mine-hunting classification program with a highest usage value derived from the suitability value and the error value.