Auxetic Backlash Lattice for Reversible Shape Transformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dynamic structures face limitations in real-time adaptability and mechanical performance due to computational intensity, stress concentrations, and lack of active response to external stimuli, particularly in auxetic and shape-changing structures.

Innovation Solution

A reconfigurable lattice structure with auxetic backlash mechanisms, comprising pivotally coupled hub elements and variable degrees of freedom, allows for compliant deformation and programmable shape transformation without internal stress through backlash regions and locking mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional auxetic and shape-changing structures are used, then shape transformation capability is achieved, but stress concentrations and limited reversibility occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape transformation capabilityVSAvoidmechanical fatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is divided into discrete unit cells with distinct components (arms, hubs, coupling elements) that can independently rotate and reconfigure. This segmentation allows stress to be distributed across multiple discrete elements rather than concentrated in continuous structures, enabling reversible shape changes without fatigue degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure employs dynamic joints with backlash clearance that allow free rotation in both directions without mechanical interference. The variable degrees of freedom enable the structure to adapt its stiffness and motion characteristics based on the applied load direction, improving reversibility and reducing stress concentrations during cyclic actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If modular robotics and reconfigurable lattice structures with embedded actuators are used, then tunability is improved, but integration complexity and control coordination increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetunabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structure utilizes passive geometric mechanisms and backlash joints that automatically provide the desired reconfiguration behavior without requiring active control of each joint. The inherent mechanical design enables self-coordination of motion across the lattice, eliminating the need for complex control systems while maintaining high tunability through geometric parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Tunability is achieved by varying geometric parameters such as arm length ratios, hub configurations, and backlash clearance dimensions rather than through active control systems. This allows the structure to be programmed with different motion characteristics during manufacturing, simplifying integration while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If traditional modeling approaches such as continuum mechanics are used, then evaluation of structure behavior is achieved, but computational intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior evaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous structure is discretized into finite unit cells with defined rigid bodies and joints, transforming the modeling approach from continuum mechanics to a discrete multibody system. This segmentation enables efficient computational analysis by reducing the degrees of freedom while maintaining accuracy in predicting structure behavior during reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables stable, large-scale shape-changing capabilities with variable degrees of freedom, maintaining mechanical stability and conforming to complex geometries with reduced stress and fatigue, suitable for applications in robotics, manufacturing, and aerospace.

Implementation Method 1

The joint comprises a backlash region defined by a clearance between the coupling element and the corresponding joint openings, thereby allowing relative motion between the first unit cell and the second unit cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBacklash: Backlash

Implementation Method 2

The reconfigurable lattice structure may comprise a covering layer disposed over the plurality of first unit cells such that the plurality of first unit cells is disposed between the covering layer and the plurality of second hub elements. The covering layer may comprise an elastic material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20260042530A1Reconfigurable lattice of auxetic, backlash structures for shape-changing systems
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 NORTHEASTERN UNIV (US)
  • US20260042530A1 patent drawing
  • US20260042530A1 patent drawing
  • US20260042530A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A reconfigurable lattice structure comprising a plurality of first unit cells arranged along a first surface region and a plurality of second unit cells arranged along a second surface region. Each unit cell has a body and multiple joint openings disposed around the body. Each second unit cell is coaxially aligned with and rotatably coupled to a corresponding first unit cell. A joint opening of a first unit cell is pivotally coupled to a joint opening of a second unit cell via a coupling element. The coupling element and joint openings collectively define a joint. The joint comprises a backlash region defined by a clearance between the coupling element and the corresponding joint openings, thereby allowing relative motion between the first unit cell and the second unit cell.