Auxiliary Control Unit for Electric Power Tool Motor Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power tools face mechanical and electronic failures due to high mechanical loads, leading to unsafe operating states, and current solutions like circuit breakers incur high costs and electrical losses, reducing battery life and generating waste heat.

Innovation Solution

An electric power tool with an auxiliary control unit independent of the motor control unit, which monitors the motor's operating state and switches it off if deviations occur, eliminating the need for circuit breakers and reducing energy losses by using a speed sensor for precise state detection and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If circuit breakers are used to ensure safety, then safety level is improved, but electrical losses increase and battery life decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoidelectrical losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical circuit breaker system with an electronic control system using semiconductor switches (MOSFETs or IGBTs) controlled by microcontrollers. This substitution eliminates the need for physical circuit breakers while maintaining safety through electronic monitoring and control, thereby reducing electrical losses and improving battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary electronic control unit that acts as a mediator between the operating switch and the motor. This control unit continuously monitors the operating state and can interrupt power supply electronically, providing safety without the need for direct circuit breaker intervention, thus reducing energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If circuit breakers are used to ensure safety, then safety level is improved, but economic costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoideconomic costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive mechanical circuit breakers with more cost-effective electronic semiconductor switches and microcontrollers. This substitution reduces component costs while maintaining or improving safety functionality through electronic monitoring and control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control unit serves multiple functions: it controls motor operation, monitors operating state, ensures safety compliance, and can implement various control strategies. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate circuit breaker components, reducing overall system cost and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If circuit breakers are used to ensure safety, then safety level is improved, but waste heat increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoidwaste heat
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical circuit breakers with electronic semiconductor switches that have lower on-resistance and more efficient switching characteristics. This substitution reduces resistive losses and waste heat generation while maintaining safety through electronic control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If mechanical and electronic monitoring systems are added to ensure safety, then safety level is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the safety monitoring functions with the existing motor control unit. The same microcontroller that controls motor operation also monitors operating state and ensures safety compliance, eliminating the need for separate safety monitoring hardware and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit is designed to perform multiple functions: motor control, operating state monitoring, safety verification, and fault detection. This multi-functional design consolidates what would otherwise be separate systems, maintaining safety while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3482881B1Electric machine tool, method for operating same, and computer program
Publication Date: 2023.03.22 METABOWERKE
  • EP3482881B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention relates to an electric power tool (1) comprising an electric motor (M), a motor control unit (2) for operating the electric motor (M), an input interface (3) for inputting a target operating state (A) of the electric motor (M) into the motor control unit (2), and a motor sensor device (8) for detecting the operating state of the electric motor (M). An auxiliary control unit (9), independent of the motor control unit (2), is provided, which is communicatively connected to the motor sensor device (8) and to the input interface (3) and is configured to compare the operating state of the electric motor (M) detected by the motor sensor device (8) with the target operating state (A) entered via the input interface (3) and, in the event of a defined deviation of the operating state from the target operating state (A), to influence the operating state of the electric motor (M) by means of a control device (10).