Auxiliary Drive for Training Device Resistance Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing strength training devices face limitations in adjusting training resistance continuously and safely, often requiring discrete changes in weight plates, which can lead to uneven loads between concentric and eccentric phases, and lack adaptability to cardiovascular values, resulting in reduced muscle growth and increased costs and safety concerns with active, fully electric systems.

Innovation Solution

An auxiliary drive system comprising a first force measuring device, a control device, and a drive unit that adjusts the target force based on actual force measurements, ensuring the maximum training resistance is never exceeded by applying a component counter to the earth's acceleration, allowing continuous and adaptive load adjustments without mechanical changes to the training device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If discrete weight plates are used for resistance adjustment, then the mechanical connection is secure and simple, but the training resistance can only be adjusted at discrete intervals and cannot be continuously adapted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining resistance adjustmentVSAvoidresistance adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical weight plate adjustment system with a hybrid system that incorporates an electric drive unit and control device. The drive unit can actively adjust the position of the mass plate, enabling continuous resistance adjustment rather than discrete steps. This substitution of mechanical adjustment with electromechanical control resolves the contradiction by providing both continuous adaptability and automated precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensors detect the position and state of the mass plate, and the control device uses this information to precisely control the drive unit. This closed-loop feedback system enables continuous and accurate resistance adjustment, allowing the training device to adapt to specific cardiovascular values and exercise requirements while maintaining secure mechanical connections through controlled engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If fully electric strength training equipment is used, then continuous dynamic resistance adjustment is possible, but the costs are significantly higher and complex safety measures are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic resistance adjustmentVSAvoidsafety and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the resistance adjustment function into two parts: a mechanical base system that provides secure, passive support and an auxiliary electric drive unit that provides active adjustment capability. This segmentation allows the device to achieve continuous dynamic resistance adjustment while relying on the robust mechanical system for safety and structural integrity, thereby reducing costs and complexity compared to fully electric systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates safety features that are activated beforehand or in advance of potential hazards. The control device monitors system state and can preemptively adjust the drive unit to prevent unsafe conditions. Additionally, the mechanical connection remains inherently secure as a passive safety backup, cushioning against potential failures of the electric components and reducing the need for complex safety systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If the total movable mass is increased for higher training resistance, then the maximum training resistance is well-defined and safe, but the load on the trainee cannot be reduced for adaptive training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety through defined maximum loadVSAvoidload adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static mass configuration into a dynamic system where the effective training resistance can be continuously adjusted by the drive unit. While the total movable mass remains fixed for safety, the drive unit can selectively engage or disengage portions of this mass, or actively counterbalance it, thereby reducing the load on the trainee when needed. This dynamic control maintains the safety of having a defined maximum load while providing the adaptability for customized training intensities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The drive unit functions as an active counterweight system, where the motor can generate forces that counteract the gravitational force of the mass plate. This allows the effective training resistance to be reduced below the full weight of the mass plate, enabling adaptive load adjustment while the full mass remains in place as a safety-defined maximum. The counterbalancing action of the drive unit provides the necessary load reduction for adaptive training protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and optimized load adjustments during exercise, reducing the risk of excessive loads, promoting muscle growth by allowing eccentric overload, and minimizing costs through modular design and reduced energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

The first force measuring device determines an actual force which is applied to a main traction device, on which a person training acts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce measurement: Force

Implementation Method 2

an auxiliary force, which has a component counter to the acceleration due to gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

the control device controls the drive unit in such a way that, by connecting the drive unit to the movable mass, an auxiliary force, FZ, acts on the movable mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3890846B1Auxiliary drive for a training device
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 KNESTEL TECH & ELEKTRONIK
  • EP3890846B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3890846B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3890846B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an auxiliary drive for a training device, said auxiliary drive comprising a first force measuring device, a control device, and a drive unit, wherein the control device is designed to determine a target force FS,max, the first force measuring device is designed to determine an actual force FS which is applied to a main traction means and which is caused substantially by an acceleration of a movable mass connected to the main traction means, and wherein the first force measuring device is also designed to transmit the determined actual force FS to the control device, the control device is also designed to compare the actual force FS with the target force FS,max and to control the drive unit such that, if the actual force FS exceeds the target force FS,max, an auxiliary force FZ having a component that offers resistance to a gravitational acceleration acts on the movable mass by means of a connection of the drive unit to the movable mass. The invention also relates to a system comprising the training device and the auxiliary drive for the training device.