Auxiliary Light Cap Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Auxiliary vehicle lights, such as off-road utility lights, often generate heat when operational and require capping to prevent damage from debris, but users may inadvertently leave caps on, risking damage and non-compliance with regulations when driving on public roads.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a user-operated actuator, a sensor to detect the cap's presence, and a controller to disable the light when the cap is installed, along with a warning indicator to notify the driver, ensuring the light is not activated with the cap on and preventing operation on public roads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If the auxiliary light is operated with the cap installed, then the light provides illumination, but the cap may be damaged by heat from the light

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight illuminationVSAvoidcap integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of cap presence before allowing light operation. The sensor detects whether the cap is installed on the auxiliary light, and the controller prevents activation based on this detection, avoiding the harmful effect before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through a sensor that continuously monitors cap presence and communicates this information to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to dynamically control the light activation, ensuring the cap is removed before operation and providing user notification through warning indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the cap is removed to operate the light, then the light can be activated, but the light becomes vulnerable to debris damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight activationVSAvoiddebris damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of cap presence before allowing light operation. The sensor detects whether the cap is installed on the auxiliary light, and the controller prevents activation based on this detection, avoiding the harmful effect before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through a sensor that continuously monitors cap presence and communicates this information to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to dynamically control the light activation, ensuring the cap is removed before operation and providing user notification through warning indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the user manually ensures cap removal, then the light can be operated safely, but user error may still occur leading to inadvertent operation with cap installed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe operationVSAvoiduser responsibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting cap presence and controlling light activation without requiring user judgment or manual verification. The sensor and controller work together to autonomously prevent operation when the cap is installed, eliminating reliance on user memory or attention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through a sensor that continuously monitors cap presence and communicates this information to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to dynamically control the light activation, ensuring the cap is removed before operation and providing user notification through warning indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the cap is left on for protection, then the light is protected from debris, but the light cannot be activated and may violate regulations requiring operational capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris protectionVSAvoidlight operational capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of cap presence before allowing light operation. The sensor detects whether the cap is installed on the auxiliary light, and the controller prevents activation based on this detection, avoiding the harmful effect before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through a sensor that continuously monitors cap presence and communicates this information to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to dynamically control the light activation, ensuring the cap is removed before operation and providing user notification through warning indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7830247B2Vehicle lighting system and method
Publication Date: 2010.11.09 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US7830247B2 patent drawing
  • US7830247B2 patent drawing
  • US7830247B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system controls an auxiliary light for a vehicle. The system includes a cockpit button to activate the auxiliary light, a Hall sensor operable to detect the installation and removal of a magnetized cover for the auxiliary light; a warning indicator; and a controller. The controller activates the warning indicator in response to the output of the sensor and the on/off state of the cockpit button.