Predicting Optimal A-V Delay via Inter-Atrial Conduction Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optimizing the atrioventricular (A-V) delay in biventricular pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is challenging, as current methods require time-consuming echocardiographic studies to ensure optimal left ventricular filling, increasing resource utilization and complexity in implantation.

Innovation Solution

Measuring the inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) during implantation to predict the optimal paced A-V delay, which correlates with echocardiographically defined optimal delays, allowing for accurate programming of the A-V delay without the need for post-implantation optimization studies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If echocardiographic studies are performed to optimize A-V delay, then accuracy of A-V delay programming is improved, but time consumption and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveA-V delay optimization accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent measures inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) during the implantation procedure itself, before the patient leaves the procedure room. This preliminary measurement of electrical conduction between atria allows prediction of the optimal A-V delay without requiring separate post-implantation echocardiographic optimization studies, thus saving time while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) as an intermediary parameter to predict optimal A-V delay. By measuring the electrical conduction time between atria during implantation and using it to calculate the predicted optimal A-V delay, the system avoids the need for time-consuming echocardiographic studies while still achieving accurate optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If echocardiographic studies are performed to optimize A-V delay, then accuracy of A-V delay programming is improved, but device complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveA-V delay optimization accuracyVSAvoidresource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) as an intermediary parameter to predict optimal A-V delay. By measuring the electrical conduction time between atria during implantation and using it to calculate the predicted optimal A-V delay, the system avoids the need for time-consuming echocardiographic studies while still achieving accurate optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The implantation team performs the IACT measurement and calculation during the implantation procedure itself, using the existing pacing leads and defibrillator system. This self-service approach eliminates the need for separate echocardiographic optimization appointments and external imaging resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7877144B2Predicting chronic optimal A-V intervals for biventricular pacing via observed inter-atrial delay
Publication Date: 2011.01.25 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US7877144B2 patent drawing
  • US7877144B2 patent drawing
  • US7877144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for optimizing the atrio-ventricular (A-V) delay for efficacious delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy. In CRT devices, the programmed A-V delay starts with detection of electrical activity in the right atrium (RA). Thus, a major component of the A-V delay is the time required for inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) from the RA to the LA. This IACT can be measured during implantation as the time from the atrial lead stimulation artifact to local electrograms in a coronary sinus (CS) catheter. Assuming that the beginning of LA contraction closely corresponds with the beginning of LA electrical activity, the optimal AV delay should be related to the time between the start of RA electrical activity and the start of LA electrical activity plus the duration of LA atrial contraction. Thus ‘during atrial pacing’ the IACT measured at implantation is correlated with the echocardiographically defined optimal paced AV delay (PAV).