Autonomous Vehicle Emergency Response Trajectory Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in effectively responding to emergency vehicles, particularly when time is critical, as they need to yield right of way and ensure passenger safety during emergencies.

Innovation Solution

The system employs sensor systems to detect emergency vehicles, determines whether to handle the response autonomously or invoke remote assistance, generates an encoded representation of the response, and plans a trajectory based on this representation, using machine learning models and path planning algorithms to navigate safely around the emergency vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles use sensor systems and machine learning models to detect and respond to emergency vehicles, then road safety and passenger protection are improved, but system complexity and response time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the emergency vehicle response problem into distinct modules: sensor detection subsystem, machine learning classification subsystem, trajectory planning subsystem, and execution subsystem. Each module handles a specific aspect of the response process, making the overall complex system manageable and reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models with emergency vehicle detection data and pre-computing multiple trajectory options before an actual emergency situation arises. This preparation enables faster and more reliable response when an emergency vehicle is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If autonomous vehicles autonomously handle emergency vehicle detection and response, then response speed is improved, but reliability may decrease due to potential autonomous system failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidresponse reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a communication interface as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicle and remote assistance operators. This allows the autonomous system to quickly detect and respond to emergency vehicles while maintaining the option to escalate to human operators for verification or additional instructions, thereby balancing speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If autonomous vehicles generate encoded representations and plan trajectories in real-time, then navigation accuracy around emergency vehicles is improved, but computational load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by generating encoded representations of only the critical trajectory parameters needed for emergency vehicle response rather than full navigation paths. This reduces computational load while maintaining sufficient navigation accuracy for the specific emergency response context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If autonomous vehicles integrate remote assistance mechanisms, then response reliability is improved, but system complexity and communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling the autonomous vehicle to independently handle routine emergency vehicle detection and response using its sensor systems and machine learning models. Remote assistance is invoked only when the autonomous system requires verification or additional guidance, reducing the overall complexity burden while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12528505B2Systems and methods for responding to detected emergency vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12528505B2 patent drawing
  • US12528505B2 patent drawing
  • US12528505B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems and methods for responding to detected emergency vehicles. In some aspects, a method includes generating an emergency vehicle (EMV) detection signal based on sensor signals of an autonomous vehicle (AV); determining, based on the EMV detection signal, whether remote assistance (RA) is invoked for the EMV signal or whether the AV is to handle the EMV detection signal autonomously; and responsive to determining that the AV is to handle the EMV detection signal autonomously, determining a trajectory of the AV in response to the EMV detection signal.