Autonomous Vehicle Merge Scenario Detection and Yield Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in safely navigating through transportation networks due to the inability to accurately detect and predict the trajectories of static and dynamic objects, leading to inefficiencies and potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method and system for merge scenario detection in autonomous vehicles, which involves identifying merge scenarios, generating yield and no-yield hypotheses for interacting objects, determining reference drivelines, and computing trajectories based on these hypotheses to ensure safe merging and navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If autonomous vehicles use basic object detection methods, then the system complexity is low, but the accuracy of detecting and predicting trajectories of static and dynamic objects is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of detecting and predicting trajectoriesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the trajectory prediction problem into multiple discrete hypotheses (e.g., yield hypothesis, no-yield hypothesis, aggressive hypothesis, conservative hypothesis) for each interacting object. Each hypothesis represents a possible future behavior with associated likelihood. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate multiple potential trajectories simultaneously without requiring a single complex predictive model, thereby improving accuracy while managing system complexity through modular hypothesis evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the set of hypotheses and their likelihoods based on real-time observations of object behavior, contextual factors, and interactions. As new sensor data arrives, the system updates the probability distributions across different hypothesis scenarios, allowing the most likely trajectory to emerge dynamically. This dynamic adaptation improves prediction accuracy without requiring a statically complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If autonomous vehicles generate multiple hypothesis trajectories for each interacting object, then the accuracy of trajectory prediction improves, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates multiple hypotheses for each interacting object (which is more than the single-trajectory approach), but applies partial evaluation by focusing computational resources on the most promising hypotheses based on initial likelihood assessments. Not all hypothesis combinations are fully evaluated to exhaustion; instead, the system prunes less likely scenarios early in the computation process, maintaining high prediction accuracy while reducing overall computational burden and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The hypothesis evaluation system uses its own output (likelihood scores from previous evaluation cycles) to guide subsequent computational efforts. High-likelihood hypotheses automatically receive more computational attention in the next iteration, while low-likelihood ones are deprioritized. This self-reinforcing mechanism allows the system to efficiently allocate computational resources without external intervention, improving processing speed while maintaining accuracy through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If autonomous vehicles consider multiple interacting object-pairs with yield and no-yield hypotheses, then the safety of navigation improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of navigationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex multi-object interaction problem into discrete object-pairs, where each pair is evaluated independently for yield/no-yield hypotheses. This segmentation allows the system to manage safety considerations for multiple objects simultaneously by breaking down the overall complexity into manageable pairwise interactions, improving navigational safety while controlling system complexity through modular analysis of each object-pair relationship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification of object-pairs into yield and no-yield categories based on initial assessment of right-of-way rules, object positions, and motion patterns. This preliminary action establishes a structured framework for safety evaluation before detailed trajectory prediction occurs, allowing the system to prepare safety hypotheses in advance and reducing the complexity of real-time decision-making while maintaining high navigational safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10745011B2Predicting yield behaviors
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 RENAULT SA
  • US10745011B2 patent drawing
  • US10745011B2 patent drawing
  • US10745011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Detection of merge scenarios by an autonomous vehicle (AV) is disclosed. A system includes a memory and a processor. The memory includes instructions executable by the processor to, in response to detecting a merge scenario, identify an interacting object pair including a merging object and a crossing object, where the AV is the merging object; generate a yield hypothesis and a no-yield hypothesis; compute a yield reference path corresponding to the yield hypothesis and a no-yield reference path corresponding to the no-yield hypothesis; determine a yield likelihood of the yield hypothesis and a no-yield likelihood of the no-yield hypothesis; and operate the AV to merge or to wait until the merge scenario is no longer detected based on the yield likelihood and the no-yield likelihood.