AV Pullover Routing Using Crowding-Aware Location Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) often cluster at pickup and drop-off locations, leading to slowdowns, increased reliance on remote assistance, and higher risks of vehicle retrieval events due to cautious navigation in tight spaces.

Innovation Solution

Implement a routing system that identifies and adjusts AV destinations to prevent clustering by filtering out crowded pullover locations based on a defined crowding metric, using algorithms to predict potential crowding and adjust routes in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If AVs navigate to the same requested pullover locations, then service demand is met, but clustering occurs causing slowdowns and safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice demand fulfillmentVSAvoidnavigation safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of requested pullover locations against historical and real-time crowding data before dispatching AVs. By predicting potential clustering events in advance and adjusting routes proactively, the system prevents crowding before it occurs, ensuring both service demand is met and navigation safety is maintained

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The route coordination system acts as an intermediary between service demand and AV navigation. It introduces a crowding assessment layer that mediates between the need to fulfill service requests and the need to avoid clustering, using historical data and real-time information to make intelligent routing decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If AVs cluster at pullover locations, then service concentration is achieved, but traffic efficiency decreases and remote assistance is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice concentrationVSAvoidtraffic slowdown
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different routing strategies to different locations based on their crowding characteristics. High-crowding locations receive route adjustments to disperse AVs, while low-crowding locations can accept direct routing. This localized quality adjustment maintains service concentration where appropriate while preventing slowdowns in crowded areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system resolves spatial clustering by introducing temporal dimensionality - staggering arrival times at pullover locations even when multiple AVs are dispatched to the same area. By distributing arrivals across different time windows, the system maintains service concentration without causing simultaneous traffic slowdowns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If AVs navigate cautiously in tight spaces, then collision risk is reduced, but navigation speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidnavigation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by preventing AVs from entering crowded areas in the first place. Through proactive route adjustment based on crowding predictions, the system eliminates the need for cautious navigation in tight spaces, allowing AVs to maintain higher speeds in open, uncrowded areas while still ensuring collision avoidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20250218299A1Autonomous vehicle pullover clustering prevention
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20250218299A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218299A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218299A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are embodiments for facilitating autonomous vehicle (AV) pullover clustering prevention. In some aspects, an embodiment includes receiving identification of an origin location and a destination location corresponding to a transportation trip request for an AV; determining a set of pullover locations comprising pickup locations for the origin location and drop-off locations for the destination location; for each pullover location of the set of pullover locations: determining an estimated time of arrival (ETA) time window for the AV at the pullover location; determining a number of other AVs expected to be at the pullover location during the ETA time window; and responsive to the number of other AVs expected to be at the pullover location during the ETA time window exceeding an AV pullover crowding metric, removing the pullover location from the set of pullover locations to produce a revised set of pullover locations.