Autonomous Vehicle Image Sensor Authentication via Cross-Sensor Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in ensuring the security and authenticity of image sensor data, particularly in detecting compromised sensors that may output invalid data, which can impact the safety and precision of navigation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a smart sensor to compare image data from multiple image sensors, determining if the data matches within predefined threshold conditions, and generating notifications if invalid data is detected, thereby ensuring data authenticity and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If image data from multiple sensors is compared and validated, then data authenticity and safety are improved, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor data authenticityVSAvoidsensor validation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary validation by comparing image data from multiple sensors before the autonomous vehicle makes navigation decisions. The system pre-establishes threshold conditions for data matching and continuously validates sensor outputs against these criteria, ensuring that only authenticated data reaches the decision-making algorithms. This preliminary action prevents invalid data from compromising safety while maintaining structured validation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation layer between the image sensors and the autonomous vehicle's control system. This intermediary component compares data from multiple sensors, evaluates matching thresholds, and filters invalid data before it reaches the navigation algorithms. The intermediary acts as a mediator that reconciles multiple sensor inputs and ensures data authenticity without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple image sensors are monitored and compared, then detection precision of invalid data is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvalid data detection precisionVSAvoiddata validation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial validation by focusing comparison efforts on critical regions of interest within image frames rather than processing every pixel uniformly. The system identifies key areas where sensor discrepancies are most likely to occur and concentrates validation resources there, achieving high detection precision for invalid data while reducing overall processing time through selective rather than exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts validation parameters such as matching thresholds and comparison sensitivity based on environmental conditions and sensor performance. By changing parameters like the threshold for data matching and the strictness of validation criteria, the system optimizes the balance between detection precision and processing speed, maintaining high accuracy while adapting computational requirements to current operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If sensor data validation thresholds are made more stringent, then data quality and safety are improved, but false positive rates and system responsiveness worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage data qualityVSAvoidsystem responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic threshold adjustment where validation criteria are not fixed but adapt based on environmental context, sensor performance history, and operational conditions. The system modifies matching thresholds and validation strictness in real-time, becoming more stringent when reliability is critical and more permissive when rapid response is needed. This dynamic approach maintains high data quality standards while preventing excessive false positives that would degrade system responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where validation results from previous frames and sensors inform threshold adjustments for current validation. The system learns from past performance, adjusting thresholds based on observed sensor behavior patterns and environmental conditions. This feedback loop ensures that stringent thresholds are applied only when necessary to maintain data quality, while normal operations benefit from more responsive, less restrictive validation that maintains productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12333819B2Autonomous vehicle sensor security, authentication and safety
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 WAYMO LLC
  • US12333819B2 patent drawing
  • US12333819B2 patent drawing
  • US12333819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes obtaining, by a processing device, an impact analysis configuration related to an image sensor operation type for an autonomous vehicle (AV), receiving, by the processing device, image data from a sensing system including at least one image sensor of the AV, causing, by the processing device, fault detection to be performed based on the image data, causing, by the processing device, a fault notification to be generated using the impact analysis configuration, and sending, by the processing device to a data processing system of the AV, the fault notification to perform at least one action to address the fault notification. The fault notification includes a fault summary related to the image sensor operation type.