Autonomous Vehicle Speed-Reducing Maneuver Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) face challenges in efficiently responding to signals requesting speed-reducing maneuvers, such as stopping, due to the need to evaluate various factors like urgency, road environment, and available stopping locations in real-time, while adapting to changing conditions during trajectory planning.

Innovation Solution

An AV system that processes signals to identify and adapt a target stopping location by analyzing data on request features, road conditions, and sensor data, continuously updating the trajectory plan and selecting an appropriate location based on quality thresholds and availability, ensuring safe and efficient execution of speed-reducing maneuvers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the AV system evaluates multiple factors (urgency, road environment, sensor data) in real-time to identify target stopping locations, then the safety and reliability of speed-reducing maneuvers is improved, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of speed-reducing maneuversVSAvoidcomputational complexity of AV system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AV system segments the complex decision-making process into distinct modules: receiving request signals from multiple sources, evaluating road environment factors, analyzing sensor data, identifying candidate stopping locations, and selecting target locations. This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of road environment and sensor data to pre-identify candidate stopping locations before a stop request is made. This preliminary action prepares the system in advance, reducing the computational burden during actual emergency stopping situations while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the AV system continuously updates trajectory plans and target locations during execution, then the adaptability to changing road conditions is improved, but the loss of time for maneuver execution increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidtime for maneuver execution
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops during trajectory execution, monitoring road conditions and sensor data to determine when updates to target locations are necessary. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing conditions only when required, minimizing unnecessary computational cycles and time loss while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The AV system performs periodic evaluations of target location validity during trajectory execution rather than continuous updates. This periodic action reduces computational overhead and time loss while still maintaining adequate adaptability to significant changes in road conditions or environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If the AV system considers multiple candidate target locations and quality thresholds, then the manufacturing precision of stopping location selection is improved, but the loss of time in selecting optimal location increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of stopping location selectionVSAvoidtime for location selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies quality thresholds and evaluation criteria specific to different stopping location characteristics (e.g., proximity to intersections, road shoulder availability, pedestrian activity). This local quality approach allows the system to make precise selections by evaluating locations against context-specific criteria rather than applying uniform standards, reducing overall selection time while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The AV system dynamically adjusts quality thresholds and evaluation parameters based on the urgency of the stop request and current road conditions. In emergency situations, thresholds are lowered to enable faster selection, while in less critical situations, higher precision criteria can be applied. This parameter adaptation balances precision requirements with time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10850734B2Processing a request signal regarding operation of an autonomous vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US10850734B2 patent drawing
  • US10850734B2 patent drawing
  • US10850734B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Among other things, a vehicle drives autonomously on a trajectory through a road network to a goal location based on an automatic process for planning the trajectory without human intervention; and an automatic process alters the planning of the trajectory to reach a target location based on a request received from an occupant of the vehicle to engage in a speed-reducing maneuver.