AV Tracking Subsystem for Dynamic Safety Buffer Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) face challenges in avoiding accidents caused by human-driven vehicles that do not comply with safety driving models, leading to potential chain-reaction collisions due to differences in response times and safe distance maintenance.

Innovation Solution

The AV system includes a tracking subsystem to detect and assess the compliance status of other vehicles, assigning safety risk grades and planning appropriate maneuvers to reduce collision risks by adjusting distance and response actions based on the compliance status of vehicles behind or lateral to it.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the AV maintains a safe distance from the leading vehicle according to the safety driving model, then the AV's collision avoidance capability is improved, but the response time to unexpected hazards increases due to the additional safety buffer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidresponse time to hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of following vehicles' compliance status before hazards occur. By pre-identifying non-compliant vehicles through tracking their distance maintenance patterns and response behaviors, the AV prepares contingency plans in advance, allowing faster reaction when hazards actually occur without compromising normal safe following distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The safety following distance is made dynamic rather than static. The system adjusts the safety buffer based on the compliance status of following vehicles - maintaining larger buffers when non-compliant vehicles are detected, and reducing buffers when following vehicles demonstrate compliant behavior. This dynamic adjustment optimizes both safety and response time under different conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the AV monitors and assesses the compliance status of all surrounding vehicles, then the detection accuracy of non-compliant vehicles is improved, but the system complexity and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of non-compliant vehiclesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different monitoring intensities to different spatial zones and vehicle types. Following vehicles receive more intensive monitoring for compliance assessment compared to lateral or leading vehicles. The system also focuses computational resources on vehicles in critical positions (directly behind or very close laterally) rather than uniformly monitoring all surrounding vehicles, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent modules: a tracking subsystem that identifies surrounding vehicles, a compliance assessment module that evaluates following behavior, and a risk evaluation module that determines overall safety. This segmentation allows each module to perform specialized functions with optimized computational requirements, reducing the complexity burden compared to a monolithic monitoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the AV takes aggressive evasive maneuvers to avoid collisions with non-compliant vehicles, then the collision avoidance effectiveness is improved, but the comfort and safety of AV passengers deteriorates due to sudden movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance effectivenessVSAvoidpassenger discomfort and safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares multiple contingency plans in advance for different levels of non-compliance risk. When non-compliant vehicles are detected, the AV pre-calculates gradual evasion trajectories and prepares phased response strategies. This allows the AV to execute smoother, more gradual maneuvers rather than sudden aggressive actions, maintaining collision avoidance effectiveness while reducing passenger discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains additional safety buffers and prepares cushioning maneuvers in advance when non-compliant vehicles are detected. Rather than making sudden sharp evasive movements, the AV uses pre-positioned safety margins and gradual course corrections to absorb potential collision risks, thereby protecting passengers from abrupt movements while still preventing collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11713056B2Autonomous vehicle system for detecting safety driving model compliance status of another vehicle, and planning accordingly
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD
  • US11713056B2 patent drawing
  • US11713056B2 patent drawing
  • US11713056B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An Autonomous Vehicle (AV) system, including: a tracking subsystem configured to detect and track relative positioning of another vehicle that is behind or lateral to an AV configured to comply with a safety driving model, and to check a safety driving model compliance status of the other vehicle; and a risk reduction subsystem configured to plan, based on the safety driving model compliance status of the other vehicle, an AV action, wherein if the safety driving model compliance status of the other vehicle is unknown or is known to be non-compliant, the AV action is administration of a safety driving model compliance test to the other vehicle, or is a maneuver by the AV to reduce risk of collision with a leading vehicle positioned in front of the AV.