Automated Availability Calculation from Reliability Block Diagrams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining the instantaneous availability of complex control systems in industrial plants are time-consuming and require significant human resources, making it difficult to continuously analyze and update reliability block diagrams, especially during operation.

Innovation Solution

An automated method that generates a reliability block diagram from a function plan, calculates the current availability of a technical system, and displays it in real-time, using a graph-based approach with a backward propagation method and transformation algorithms like ATL, allowing for dynamic and continuous availability calculation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual generation of reliability block diagram is used, then reliability analysis can be performed, but enormous amount of human resources and time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability determinationVSAvoidanalysis speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of creating reliability block diagrams with an automated computer-based system. The control system automatically generates the reliability block diagram from process control data and calculates availability without human intervention, substituting manual labor with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining its own availability metrics. The control system queries the status of its own components, generates the reliability block diagram, and calculates availability independently without requiring external manual analysis, enabling continuous self-monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual generation of reliability block diagram is used, then reliability analysis can be performed, but continuous analysis during operation is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability determinationVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous availability determination during system operation. The control system continuously queries component statuses and recalculates availability in real-time, maintaining uninterrupted monitoring throughout the operational lifecycle rather than performing discrete periodic analyses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing the reliability block diagram structure from process control data before operation begins. This allows the system to quickly calculate availability as components fail or are repaired without requiring time-consuming manual reconstruction of the reliability model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If design changes are reflected in reliability block diagram, then updated reliability analysis can be performed, but it is very time-consuming for complex systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign change reflectionVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic reliability block diagram that automatically adapts to design changes. When process control data changes due to design modifications, the system automatically updates the reliability block diagram structure and recalculates availability, transforming the static manual update process into a dynamic automated response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If Monte Carlo simulation is used for availability calculation, then theoretical availability can be determined, but significant computing effort is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability calculationVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential availability calculation from complex Monte Carlo simulations. Instead of performing extensive probabilistic simulations for each component, the system uses the reliability block diagram structure to directly calculate availability based on component statuses, removing the computationally intensive simulation layer while retaining the core availability assessment function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3770709B1Method for operating an automated technical installation
Publication Date: 2022.03.30 SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3770709B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3770709B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3770709B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating an automated technical system comprising a plurality of hardware components that are interconnected according to a design plan to control a process within the system. The method according to the invention is designed such that, in a first step, a reliability block diagram for the system or parts thereof is automatically generated from the system's functional plan. Furthermore, status information is queried and/or read out for each component (optionally from the functional plan). Based on the reliability block diagram and the status information of each component, a graph is generated with which the current availability of the system or parts thereof is calculated.This information is displayed on a display unit, and the current availability can now be considered by an operator during the ongoing operation of the technical system to determine whether an intervention in the operation of the technical system is to be carried out.