Balancing Avalanche Photodiodes in Coherent Receivers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current balanced photodetection receivers using PIN photodetectors face limitations in enhancing received signal sensitivity due to fixed optical-to-electrical conversion, leading to increased power consumption and noise, and complexity in RF gain adjustments, while Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) require precise bias voltage control for optimal performance.

Innovation Solution

The system dynamically adjusts the reverse bias voltages of a pair of APDs and the Transimpedance Amplifier's common-mode AC response to optimize Common-Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), allowing for lower Local Oscillator power consumption and improved signal quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If LO power is increased to enhance received signal, then receiver sensitivity is improved, but power consumption and noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver sensitivityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating parameters of the APD by dynamically adjusting the reverse bias voltage to optimize the multiplication factor. This allows the receiver to achieve high sensitivity without requiring increased LO power, thereby resolving the contradiction between sensitivity improvement and power consumption increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring the common-mode output signal and using it to adjust the reverse bias voltage of the APD. This feedback mechanism enables automatic optimization of the receiver sensitivity while maintaining stable operation without requiring excessive LO power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If LO power is increased to enhance received signal, then receiver sensitivity is improved, but noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver sensitivityVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the APD multiplication factor by adjusting the reverse bias voltage, enabling high sensitivity operation at lower LO power levels. This parameter optimization reduces the generation of optical noise while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of common-mode signals into a useful feedback metric. By monitoring the common-mode output and using it to control the APD bias voltage, the system eliminates noise while maintaining sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If RF gain is increased to enhance received signal, then receiver sensitivity is improved, but design complexity and power dissipation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver sensitivityVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the need for complex RF gain stages with an optical-domain solution using APD multiplication. By performing signal amplification in the optical domain through controlled avalanche multiplication, the system achieves high sensitivity without adding complex RF electronics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves signal enhancement by changing the electrical parameter (reverse bias voltage) of the APD rather than adding RF gain stages. This parameter control approach simplifies the overall receiver design while maintaining high sensitivity performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If RF gain is increased to enhance received signal, then receiver sensitivity is improved, but power dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver sensitivityVSAvoidpower dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes optical-domain APD multiplication for RF-domain gain amplification. This substitution eliminates the need for power-hungry RF gain stages while achieving the same sensitivity improvement through controlled avalanche multiplication in the optical domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves sensitivity enhancement by optimizing the APD's reverse bias voltage parameter rather than increasing RF gain. This approach reduces power dissipation while maintaining high receiver sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Measurement precision

If APD bias voltage is adjusted for optimal performance, then receiver sensitivity is improved, but common-mode rejection becomes difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver sensitivityVSAvoidbias voltage control
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system that monitors the common-mode output signal and uses it to automatically adjust the APD reverse bias voltage. This feedback mechanism simultaneously optimizes both sensitivity and common-mode rejection, making the system easy to operate without manual tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the receiver to self-optimize its performance by using the common-mode signal itself as the feedback metric for bias control. The system automatically adjusts its own bias voltage to achieve optimal sensitivity and common-mode rejection without external intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the sensitivity of APD receivers, achieving comparable sensitivity to PIN receivers with lower LO power, allowing more laser power for transmitter output while maintaining receiver performance and improving interfering channel rejection.

Implementation Method 1

Avalanche Photodiodes (APD) can achieve 5-10 dB higher sensitivity (lower optical power)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

A pair of Avalanche Photodiodes (APD) in a coherent receiver

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAvalanche Breakdown: Avalanche Breakdown

Data Source

PatentUS11404596B1Balancing a pair of avalanche photodiodes in a coherent receiver
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 CIENA CORP
  • US11404596B1 patent drawing
  • US11404596B1 patent drawing
  • US11404596B1 patent drawing

AI summary

System and methods implemented in a coherent receiver having a pair of Avalanche Photodiodes (APD) include adjusting one or more of a reverse bias voltage (VAPD) on a P-path (VAPDP) and on an N-path (VAPDN) responsive to an output (PIN,CM) that indicates electrical power of an AC common-mode input signal; adjusting a Transimpedance Amplifier (TIA) common-mode AC response, AdjCM_AC_Response, responsive to an output (POUT,CM) that indicates electrical power of an AC common-mode output signal; and/or adjusting one or more of VAPDP and VAPDN responsive to received signal Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR).