Avatar Control Identification in Virtual Spaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information management apparatuses in three-dimensional virtual spaces struggle to distinguish between human-controlled and AI-controlled avatars, leading to invalid analysis results and a need to identify whether displayed objects are human or AI-driven.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus equipped with a judging unit and a display control unit that determines whether an object displayed as an agent of action is controlled by a human or AI, and adjusts its display manner accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If avatar behavior is used for user analysis in marketing, then marketing effectiveness is improved, but analysis validity deteriorates when avatars act via artificial intelligence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarketing effectivenessVSAvoidanalysis validity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments avatars into two distinct categories: human-controlled avatars and AI-controlled avatars. This segmentation is achieved by implementing a judgment mechanism that analyzes avatar behavior patterns, communication styles, and decision-making processes to determine the control type. By separating these categories, the system can apply different analysis methods and validation criteria for each type, thereby maintaining analysis validity while preserving marketing effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary judgment mechanism that acts as a mediator between avatar behavior observation and user analysis. This intermediary layer analyzes multiple dimensions including response time patterns, language characteristics, and behavioral consistency to determine whether an avatar is human-controlled or AI-controlled. This intermediary process ensures that only valid human behavior data is used in marketing analysis, eliminating contamination from AI-generated behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If avatars act autonomously via artificial intelligence, then operational efficiency is improved, but identifiability of human control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoididentifiability of human control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs metaphorical 'color changes' by implementing visual or metadata indicators that distinguish AI-controlled avatars from human-controlled ones. These indicators could include specific icons, labels, or display attributes that change based on the judgment result. This approach maintains the autonomous operational efficiency of AI avatars while providing clear identifiability through distinctive visual or data markers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual inspection methods with an automated judgment system that uses machine learning algorithms and behavioral analysis to detect AI control. This substitution of mechanical/human detection methods with automated electronic systems enables efficient identification of AI-controlled avatars without compromising operational speed or requiring additional manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If single avatar is associated with single user for analysis, then data simplicity is improved, but analysis accuracy deteriorates when AI control is involved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata structure simplicityVSAvoidbehavior analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a dynamic data structure where the avatar-user association is not fixed but adaptable based on control type. For human-controlled avatars, the simple one-to-one association is maintained. For AI-controlled avatars, the system dynamically adjusts by creating separate identification pathways and analysis streams. This dynamic approach preserves data structure simplicity for human cases while enabling accurate differentiation and analysis for AI cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite data model that combines simple identification fields with complex behavioral analysis layers. The base layer maintains simple avatar-user associations for efficiency, while an additional composite layer overlays behavioral patterns, judgment results, and control type metadata. This composite structure allows the system to retain simplicity where applicable while incorporating necessary complexity for accurate AI detection and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250103691A1Information processing apparatus, display control method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 NEC CORP
  • US20250103691A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103691A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103691A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Whether an object is acting under control of a human or via artificial intelligence is made identifiable. An information processing apparatus includes: a judging unit 101 for judging whether an object displayed as an agent of action is acting under control of a human or via artificial intelligence; and a display control unit 102 for causing a display manner of the object to be in accordance with the result of the judgment made by the judging unit 101.