Computationally Designed avβ6 Binders for TGF-β Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current therapies lack effective targeting of alpha(v) beta (6) integrin (avb6) for treating avb6(+) tumors and pulmonary fibrosis such as Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), as existing treatments do not adequately address the role of avb6 in tumor progression and fibrosis.

Innovation Solution

Design and development of polypeptides with specific amino acid sequences that bind to avb6 integrin with high affinity, including sequences such as SEQ ID NOS:1-3, which can be used to treat avb6(+) tumors and block TGF-B signaling, thereby inhibiting tumor growth and fibrosis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current therapies are used to target avb6, then treatment is provided, but the therapies lack specificity and efficacy resulting in poor overall survival

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidtherapy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses computational design to create de novo protein binders that copy and mimic the natural ligand-binding interface of TGF-β1 with avβ6 integrin. These designed proteins replicate the specific molecular interactions (RGD motif binding to integrin) that naturally occur, achieving sub-nanomolar affinity while maintaining simplicity in therapeutic application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically optimizes key parameters of the protein binders including affinity (achieving sub-nanomolar Kd), specificity (selective binding to avβ6 over other integrins), and stability (hyperstable de novo structures). These parameter optimizations resolve the contradiction by achieving high therapeutic efficacy through computationally tuned binding properties without increasing therapy complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If high affinity binders are designed to target avb6, then blocking of TGF-β signaling is achieved, but serum half-life may be extended causing systemic exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget binding affinityVSAvoidserum half-life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs aerosolized localized delivery to the lung tissue, creating a local concentration gradient where the binder acts primarily at the target site (avβ6-positive fibrotic tissue in lungs) rather than circulating systemically. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high local affinity effects while minimizing systemic duration through localized administration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential binding function from full-length antibodies or complex TGF-β antagonists, creating minimal de novo protein binders that contain only the necessary RGD-containing binding domain. This simplified structure achieves high affinity while enabling shorter half-life and localized delivery, separating the binding function from unnecessary systemic circulation components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If specific avb6 targeting is achieved, then selective blocking of TGF-β signaling occurs, but current therapies lack the required specificity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovespecificityVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs universal de novo protein binders with a standardized RGD-containing binding interface that specifically recognizes avβ6 integrin. This universal design approach achieves high specificity through computationally optimized sequence-structure relationships, resolving the contradiction by demonstrating that specific targeting can be achieved through rational design rather than complex empirical therapy development

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces empirical, trial-and-error therapeutic development with computational design algorithms that systematically optimize protein sequences for avβ6 binding. This substitution of computational mechanics for experimental mechanics achieves high specificity through in silico optimization of binding interfaces, reducing design complexity compared to iterative wet-lab approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12630584B2Computational design of alpha(v) beta (6) integrin binding proteins
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENT CORP
  • US12630584B2 patent drawing
  • US12630584B2 patent drawing
  • US12630584B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Alpha(v) beta (6) integrin (avb6) binding polypeptides are disclosed herein, and their use in treating and detecting tumors, and their use in treating pulmonary fibrosis.