Avionic Image Analysis via Algorithmic Complexity Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current avionic systems rely heavily on human interpretation of complex and noisy images, which can be difficult to process, especially during critical flight phases, and lack efficient methods for rapid detection of known objects.

Innovation Solution

The method involves calculating algorithmic complexity and logical depth to categorize image objects into discrete levels of structuring, allowing for rapid analysis and detection of relevant objects, independent of sensor types, and enabling early anticipation of potential hazards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex image processing operations are performed on noisy images using traditional EVS/SVS/CVS systems, then image interpretation quality may improve, but response time increases and computational complexity becomes unmanageable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage interpretation qualityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image processing task by dividing the image into multiple blocks and processing each block independently through parallel operations. This segmentation enables simultaneous execution of complexity calculation, object detection, and categorization across different image regions, dramatically reducing overall response time while maintaining interpretation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of algorithmic complexity and logical depth for each image block before executing detailed object detection and analysis. This preliminary action identifies regions of interest and prioritizes processing sequences, allowing the system to focus computational resources on critical areas and avoid unnecessary processing, thus reducing response time without sacrificing interpretation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If sophisticated algorithms with high processor power are deployed, then image analysis capability improves, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage analysis capabilityVSAvoidprocessor power requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated calculation of algorithmic complexity and logical depth metrics that guide the processing pipeline. The system automatically identifies structured versus unstructured regions, determines processing priorities, and adjusts resource allocation without external intervention. This self-organizing approach simplifies device architecture by replacing complex centralized control with distributed autonomous decision-making at each processing stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes processing parameters dynamically based on calculated complexity metrics. Instead of using fixed sophisticated algorithms throughout, the system adjusts processing intensity, block size, and analysis depth according to the measured algorithmic complexity and logical depth of each image region. This adaptive parameter adjustment maintains high analysis capability while reducing computational requirements in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If human interpretation is required for noisy images, then detection accuracy may improve, but productivity and rapid response capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidrapid response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces algorithmic complexity and logical depth calculations as intermediary metrics between raw image data and final detection results. These intermediary calculations provide structured information about image regions that guides automated object detection, serving as a bridge that enables machine processing to achieve accuracy previously requiring human interpretation. The intermediary metrics organize noisy data into meaningful patterns that both machines and humans can efficiently process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11017256B2Rapid analysis of images
Publication Date: 2021.05.25 THALES SA
  • US11017256B2 patent drawing
  • US11017256B2 patent drawing
  • US11017256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for the rapid analysis of images that are particularly useful in avionic contexts are provided. One specific method describes steps of computing algorithmic complexity and/or logical depth, so as to rapidly categorize objects, comprising images and/or points of interest determined in these images, according to discrete levels of structuring, organization or order. Complex image processing operations may then concern restricted subsections of the images. The complexity or logical depth computing operations may for example comprise steps of losslessly compressing the objects row by row and/or column by column, of determining statistical distributions of the compression rates of these objects, of determining one or more scores on the basis of the compression rates or of statistical moments and of locally or globally categorizing one or more received images. Developments describe system and software aspects.