Avionics Display Architecture Independent Processing Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing avionics display systems in aircraft, such as the Boeing 787, have limited growth capacity and are based on outdated technology, consuming excessive space and power, with the Display and Crew Alerting system consuming a significant number of General Purpose Modules and requiring redundant hardware for high integrity and availability.

Innovation Solution

A high integrity, high availability avionics display architecture featuring display processing computers with independent processing channels and integrity feedback interfaces, which offloads display processing from cabinets to new hardware, reducing resource consumption and leveraging modern components to minimize size, weight, and power usage, while maintaining or exceeding current integrity and availability standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the Display and Crew Alerting system uses traditional General Purpose Modules and Graphics Generation Modules in the Common Core System, then the system can provide display and alerting functions, but the system consumes excessive space (5 of 16 GPMs) and power, and has limited growth capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrity and availabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into independent Display Processing Computers (DPCs) that are physically separated from the Common Core System cabinets. Each DPC is a standalone unit with its own processing channels, I/O sections, and graphics sections, allowing it to operate independently and reducing the resource burden on the main system while maintaining high integrity and availability through redundant independent processing channels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The display processing functionality is extracted from the Common Core System's General Purpose Modules and Graphics Generation Modules. The DPCs are removed from the cabinet-based IMA architecture and deployed as separate units, freeing up cabinet resources (5 of 16 GPMs) and reducing overall power consumption while maintaining the required display and alerting functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the system uses older graphics generation hardware from the late 1990s, then the display system can function, but it requires more space and power than modern electronics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay functionVSAvoidspace requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from late 1990s technology to modern electronics by implementing DPCs with contemporary processors, memory, and graphics hardware. This parameter change in technology generation reduces the space and power requirements significantly while maintaining and improving display functionality through modern display technologies including touch displays and HUDs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system implements high integrity and availability through redundant hardware in the Common Core System, then the required reliability can be achieved, but the device complexity and hardware support requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveintegrityVSAvoidhardware support
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The redundant hardware is segmented into independent DPC units rather than being consolidated within the Common Core System. Each DPC contains independent processing channels (at least two independent lanes per channel) that can operate autonomously, providing fault tolerance without requiring complex interconnections and hardware support within a single cabinet system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses independent copying of processing channels where each DPC has duplicate processing capabilities that can operate independently. This copying approach provides redundancy for fault tolerance while simplifying hardware support compared to complex redundant architectures, as each DPC is a complete functional copy that can be independently managed and replaced

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8743020B1Avionics display architecture with independent processing and monitoring channels
Publication Date: 2014.06.03 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US8743020B1 patent drawing
  • US8743020B1 patent drawing
  • US8743020B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A high integrity, high availability avionics display architecture for an avionics display system. The architecture includes a plurality of display processing computers (DPC) and a plurality of display integrity feedback interfaces. Each DPC includes at least two independent processing channels. Each independent processing channel includes at least two independent lanes. Each independent lane includes an I/O section and a processor section. Furthermore, each independent processing channel comprises an operative graphics section. At least one of the independent lanes provides a critical display function that provides commands to the graphics section to drive a display signal to displays of the avionics system. A number of display integrity feedback interfaces from the displays of the avionics display system provide integrity by allowing the integrity monitor functions to detect faults within the display signals and/or originating from the displays.