Symbol Validation System for Avionics Display Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for validating graphical symbol generation in safety-critical applications, such as avionics, are costly and complex, and fail to effectively handle complex, spatially proximate, or mixed symbols, which can lead to misinterpretation and accidents.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generate symbols based on source information from physical equipment, attributing symbol attributes to pixels, identifying and validating these attributes through characteristic information calculation, and raising alerts for invalidations, using a two-processing-chain system to ensure rapid and reliable validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If double generation of video streams by two different graphical generation systems is used to ensure high safety level, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation system that processes the output of a single graphical generation system. Instead of using two complete graphical generation systems, a validation module is inserted as an intermediary to verify the correctness of symbols generated by one system, thereby achieving high safety levels with reduced complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system creates a simplified copy or representation of the generated symbols through characteristic information extraction. By analyzing key features and attributes of the generated symbols rather than regenerating entire video streams, the system achieves verification with lower computational resources and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If DO-178 and DO-254 standards are applied to develop software and hardware, then reliability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assuranceVSAvoiddevelopment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies safety validation selectively to critical elements (symbols and their characteristic information) rather than uniformly to the entire graphical generation system. By focusing validation resources on locally critical components, the system achieves safety assurance without the excessive cost of applying full DO-178/DO-254 standards across all software and hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system changes the parameters being monitored from complete video stream regeneration to specific characteristic information of symbols (geometric properties, positions, attributes). This parameter transformation enables effective safety validation with reduced computational cost and simplified development requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If optical character recognition technologies are used for symbol validation, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates for complex, spatially proximate, or mixed symbols

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation feasibilityVSAvoidvalidation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the symbol validation process into distinct characteristic information extraction steps (geometric properties, positions, attributes) rather than attempting holistic recognition. This segmentation enables reliable validation of complex, spatially proximate, or mixed symbols by analyzing their constituent features separately and systematically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional optical character recognition mechanisms with a systematic attribute-based validation approach. Instead of using image processing algorithms to recognize symbols, the system substitutes a method that extracts and validates specific characteristics of generated symbols, achieving higher reliability for complex symbol sets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11810230B2Method and system for validating the graphical generation of symbols to display
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 THALES SA
  • US11810230B2 patent drawing
  • US11810230B2 patent drawing
  • US11810230B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and system for validating the graphical generation of symbols to display, comprising a graphical generation of symbols to display to form a video stream comprising a plurality of rasters, comprising a pixel generation, with the attribution of at least one associated symbol attribute for each pixel contributing to one of said symbols. The method comprises, for at least one raster of said video stream: obtaining at least one reference symbol attribute associated with at least one symbol to be monitored; identifying pixels having the reference symbol attribute(s), during a scan of the pixels of said raster in a predetermined course direction, these pixels contributing to said at least one symbol to be monitored, and calculating associated characteristic information; validating the display of the symbol(s) to be monitored based on the calculated characteristic information and of source information associated with said symbols to display.