Automated Valuation Model Property Condition Indexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated valuation models (AVMs) face challenges in accurately assessing and adjusting for property condition, which is subjective and difficult to evaluate objectively.

Innovation Solution

The development of an automated system that indexes and adjusts for property condition by accessing property data, performing regressions to model relationships between price and property characteristics and condition variables, using remarks, year built categories, and number of photos to create a property-condition index for geographical areas, and applying exclusion rules and weighting to refine comparable properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated valuation models use objective property characteristics (number of bedrooms, lot size) for evaluation, then evaluation speed and automation are improved, but the ability to assess subjective property condition deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidproperty condition assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that bridges objective data and subjective assessment by using automated image analysis and natural language processing of remarks to extract property condition information. This intermediary translates non-structured visual and textual data into quantifiable condition scores that can be integrated into the AVM framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection methods with automated computational systems. Instead of human appraisers physically inspecting properties, the system uses computer vision algorithms to analyze property images and automated text processing to evaluate remarks, thereby maintaining automation while improving condition assessment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If automated systems attempt to assess subjective property condition, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty condition assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex property condition assessment task into distinct components: image quality analysis, remark text analysis, and synthesis of condition scores. Each component is handled by specialized algorithms that process specific types of data independently, then combine results to form the overall condition assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified representations (copies) of complex property conditions through standardized condition scores and indices. Instead of attempting to model every aspect of property condition, the system creates condensed numerical representations that capture the essential condition information needed for valuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If multiple property condition variables (remarks, photos, year built) are incorporated into regression models, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondition index accuracyVSAvoidregression model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple property condition variables (remarks, photos, year built) into a unified property condition index through regression analysis. Instead of treating each variable separately in the valuation model, the system combines them into a single composite index that captures the overall condition effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms diverse property condition inputs (textual remarks, image counts, categorical year built data) into a standardized numerical parameter (property condition index). This parameter transformation allows different types of data to be integrated into a unified regression framework with consistent scaling and interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12045899B2Indexing and adjusting for property condition in an automated valuation model
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 FANNIE MAE
  • US12045899B2 patent drawing
  • US12045899B2 patent drawing
  • US12045899B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Indexing and adjusting for property condition in an automated valuation model. Property data corresponding to a geographical area is accessed, and a regression is performed based upon the property data. The regression models the relationship between a dependent variable, such as price, and property-characteristic explanatory variables. Further regression is then performed and models or further explains the relationship between the dependent variable and property condition explanatory variables. Specifically, further regression may model the relationship between the residual from the first regression and the property condition variables. Optional examples of these variables are those based upon the presence of predetermined remarks in associated property listings, the number of photos in such listings, and a categorical year built variable. The regression is used to determine a property-condition index for the geographical area. The property-condition index identifies a predicted condition that is used to make adjustments to comparable properties in automated valuation modeling.