Autonomous Vehicle Avoidance Control with Dual Passing Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current avoidance control methods for autonomous driving vehicles lack rationality and stability, often resulting in conservative and human-unlike decision-making, especially when faced with sudden dangers, leading to instability and poor passenger experience.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an avoidance control method that uses outer and inner soft constraints based on target object appearance and speed information to determine passing areas, allowing the vehicle to avoid obstacles while maintaining a safe distance and direction away from them, with visual feedback to users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If avoidance control is implemented to prevent collision with target objects, then safety is improved, but the stability and rationality of avoidance behavior deteriorates due to sudden and sensitive control responses

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidstability of avoidance process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the avoidance control into two distinct constraint layers: outer constraints that define the boundary of the target object's occupation area, and inner constraints that define a safety margin area inside the outer constraint. This segmentation allows the system to first ensure basic collision avoidance through outer constraints, then enhance stability and rationality through inner constraints that guide the vehicle to maintain a safer distance from the target object, avoiding sudden and sensitive responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If the vehicle maintains a larger safety distance from target objects, then stability and rationality of avoidance behavior is improved, but the passing area available for maneuvering is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of avoidance processVSAvoidpassing area
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic constraint adjustment based on the relative motion state between the autonomous vehicle and the target object. When the target object is moving away or stationary, the inner constraint allows the vehicle to approach closer, maximizing the passing area. When the target object is moving towards the vehicle or in a state that increases collision risk, the inner constraint automatically expands to maintain a larger safety distance. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the safety margin to the actual risk level, ensuring stability when needed while preserving maneuvering space when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260014981A1Avoidance control method, intelligent device, and vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 YINWANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • US20260014981A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014981A1 patent drawing
  • US20260014981A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent device may determine a first constraint of avoidance control based on first information of the target object in a surrounding environment of the intelligent device, where the first constraint indicates a first passing area in which the intelligent device avoids the target object; and determine a second constraint of avoidance control based on second information of the target object, where the second constraint indicates a second passing area that is in the first passing area and in which the intelligent device is away from the target object. Based on the first constraint and the second constraint, the intelligent device can keep the vehicle away from the target object as far as possible while ensuring safety by avoidance.