Awning Base Profile Segmentation for Reduced Moment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing awning structures face challenges in reducing horizontal projection and moment on fixing plates, with complex designs that compromise ease of assembly and aesthetics, particularly when dealing with smooth walls and facades with pillars.

Innovation Solution

A modular awning structure featuring a canvas winder, articulated arms, fixing brackets, and a continuous base profile with a vertical section longer than horizontal, allowing for staggered assembly and reduced horizontal extension, with a reel housing supported above the base section and a pull-up bar that covers the arms in the retracted position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the base profile accommodates the winder and provides multiple functions, then the structure can be integrated, but the horizontal extension and moment on fixing plates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure integrationVSAvoidhorizontal extension
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the base profile into separate functional segments: a first base portion for structural support and fixing, and a second base portion for winder accommodation. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized independently, reducing the overall horizontal extension while maintaining integration benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a horizontal arrangement to a vertical arrangement by positioning the winder above the base profile rather than extending it horizontally. This dimensional change reduces the horizontal projection of the structure while maintaining all necessary functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the base profile is extended horizontally to accommodate the winder, then the winder can be integrated, but the moment on fixing plates increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewinder integrationVSAvoidmoment on fixing plates
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the base profile into a first base portion that provides structural support and a second base portion that accommodates the winder. This segmentation allows the winder to be integrated vertically above the support portion, reducing the horizontal lever arm and thereby decreasing the moment on fixing plates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent repositions the winder from a horizontal extension to a vertical position above the base profile. This dimensional change moves the winder's center of gravity closer to the fixing plates, reducing the rotational moment while maintaining integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If a continuous base profile supports multiple functions, then assembly can be simplified, but the design becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly easeVSAvoidbase profile design
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous base profile into distinct first and second portions with different functions. This segmentation simplifies the design of each portion while maintaining the continuity and ease of assembly of the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different design qualities to different portions of the base profile: the first base portion is designed for structural support and fixing, while the second base portion is designed for winder accommodation. This local differentiation simplifies each portion's design while maintaining overall integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If the structure is arranged horizontally, then assembly is straightforward, but the projection in horizontal dimension increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly straightforwardnessVSAvoidhorizontal projection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a horizontal arrangement to a vertical arrangement by positioning the winder above the base profile. This dimensional change significantly reduces the horizontal projection while maintaining assembly straightforwardness through the continuous base profile design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3346072B1Awning structure
Publication Date: 2023.01.11 PRODUCCIONES MITJAVILA
  • EP3346072B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3346072B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3346072B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6

AI summary

A blind structure comprising an assembly with shading elements, a substructure for supporting the shading elements having a rear profile intended to be fixed to a wall or pillars, comprising means for fixing the rear profile to the wall or pillars, wherein the fixing means comprise fixing plates for the assembly to a wall or pillars having an upward-facing fixing hook, the rear profile having a portion having a shape complementary to the fixing hooks, so that the fixing plates can be located at different points on the rear profile.