Axial Gap Motor Dust Core Layout for Low Torque Ripple

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing axial gap-type rotary electric machines face challenges in productivity and energy efficiency due to the separate fabrication and assembly of yokes and teeth, leading to variations in tooth protrusion heights, increased electromagnetic and mechanical energy losses, and noise from torque ripples.

Innovation Solution

The use of a dust core with integrally formed yokes and teeth, where the powder feeding machine ensures symmetrical filling, reducing tooth height variations and enabling equal intertooth distances, thereby minimizing torque ripples and enhancing energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If yokes and teeth are fabricated separately and assembled, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to variations in tooth protrusion heights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidtooth protrusion height consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the yoke and teeth into a single integrally formed dust core component. The yoke and teeth are simultaneously formed from magnetic powder in one die cavity during the sintering process, eliminating the need for separate fabrication and assembly operations. This integral structure ensures consistent tooth protrusion heights and eliminates assembly errors, directly resolving the contradiction between manufacturing flexibility and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If yokes and teeth are assembled separately, then ease of assembly is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to additional assembly steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple manufacturing operations into a single integrated process. The yoke and teeth are formed simultaneously in one die cavity during the sintering process, eliminating separate assembly steps. This reduces manufacturing complexity and improves productivity while maintaining ease of operation through the simplified single-step process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The die cavity is pre-designed with the complete three-dimensional structure of both the yoke and teeth in their final positions. The magnetic powder is fed and sintered in this pre-configured die, so the components are formed in their final assembled state without requiring subsequent assembly operations, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If separate yoke and teeth assembly is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but energy efficiency deteriorates due to increased electromagnetic losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidelectromagnetic energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The integral dust core structure eliminates air gaps and misalignments between separately assembled yoke and teeth components. This creates continuous magnetic flux paths with reduced magnetic reluctance and minimized eddy current losses, directly improving energy efficiency while the ease of manufacture is maintained through the simplified single-step sintering process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of manufacture

If separate yoke and teeth assembly is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but noise levels increase due to torque ripples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidnoise from torque ripples
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The integral dust core structure ensures precise geometric relationships between yoke and teeth with consistent tooth protrusion heights. This eliminates variations in air gaps and magnetic flux distribution that cause torque ripples and associated noise, while the ease of manufacture is preserved through the single-step sintering process that forms both components simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250007336A1Rotary electric machine
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US20250007336A1 patent drawing
  • US20250007336A1 patent drawing
  • US20250007336A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an axial gap-type rotary electric machine in which a first stator, a second stator, and a rotor are arranged in a direction of a rotary shaft of the rotor. The first stator includes a first coil and a first core. The second stator includes a second coil and a second core. The first core includes an annular first yoke, a plurality of first teeth, and a first mark indicating a reference position in a circumferential direction of the first yoke. The second core includes an annular second yoke, a plurality of second teeth, and a second mark indicating a reference position in a circumferential direction of the second yoke.