Axial Piston Cavity Segmentation for Hydraulic Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing axial piston machines face challenges with solid pistons at higher speeds due to strength and thermal issues, while hollow pistons suffer from efficiency losses due to dead spaces and complex manufacturing processes.

Innovation Solution

A piston design featuring a pressure-tightly sealed cavity with multiple chambers, stabilized by webs, allowing for separate or partial connection of chambers, and manufactured using material-removing or forming processes, such as extrusion or DMLS, to enhance stability and reduce production costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If hollow pistons with open cavities are used to reduce mass for higher speeds, then weight is reduced, but dead space is created causing efficiency deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston massVSAvoidhydraulic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity is divided into multiple separate chambers instead of forming a single continuous dead space. This segmentation allows the hydraulic fluid to flow through the chambers without creating compression/expansion dead zones, maintaining efficiency while still reducing overall piston mass compared to solid design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cavity chambers are arranged in a specific spatial configuration (e.g., radially distributed around the piston axis) rather than along the axial direction. This dimensional arrangement eliminates dead space compression while preserving weight reduction benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the cavity is sealed pressure-tight to eliminate dead space, then hydraulic efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic efficiencyVSAvoidpiston structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The piston body structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the structural framework, contains the sealed chambers, and guides the hydraulic flow paths. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining pressure-tight sealing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The chambers are nested within the piston body structure in a compact arrangement, with chamber walls formed as integral parts of the piston. This nesting eliminates the need for separate sealing components and simplifies the manufacturing process while ensuring pressure-tight containment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of manufacture

If material-removing methods are used to create chambers, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but piston stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechamber production easeVSAvoidpiston stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Material is removed selectively from specific regions of the piston to create chambers, while maintaining full material density in critical structural areas. This localized material distribution ensures ease of chamber manufacturing while preserving piston stability in load-bearing regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The piston employs a composite structural approach where solid material regions provide structural stability and chamber regions provide weight reduction. The transition between these regions is designed to maintain overall structural integrity while enabling straightforward chamber fabrication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Productivity

If chambers are arranged to minimize dead space, then hydraulic efficiency is improved, but piston structural stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic efficiencyVSAvoidpiston stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Chambers are arranged in a radial or circumferential pattern around the piston axis rather than in axial alignment. This dimensional reconfiguration eliminates dead space for hydraulic efficiency while the radial distribution maintains structural balance and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The piston structure is segmented into multiple discrete chamber units distributed throughout the body. This segmentation allows each chamber to be optimally positioned for hydraulic efficiency while the distributed arrangement maintains overall structural stability through balanced material distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2784313B1Piston for an axial piston machine
Publication Date: 2018.06.27 LIEBHERR MACHINES BULLE
  • EP2784313B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2784313B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP2784313B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The piston has a cavity that closed in a pressure-tight way in the interior of a piston portion (4). The webs are left between several chambers into which the cavity is divided. The hollow and cylindrical chambers are arranged beside the other in cross-section of the piston portion and/or extended axially in the piston portion. The piston portion is provided with an integral base element in which the chambers are incorporated, and wherein the chambers are closed towards a working surface of the piston by one or more closure elements. An independent claim is included for the method for manufacturing piston for axial piston machine.