Multi-Axis Axis Control Tuning Using Knowledge-Based Inference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-axis machining requires time-consuming and iterative tuning of axis control features by experienced engineers, with limited ability to reuse data and classify axis types, leading to uncertainty in achieving desired workpiece quality and cutting time.

Innovation Solution

A system with a knowledge base and inference unit that uses uniform ontology and data representation to automatically infer new output facts for axis control tuning, reducing iterations and providing tuning recommendations, and a learning unit for capturing associations between input and output facts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If experienced engineers manually tune axis control features through trial-and-error, then tuning effectiveness can be achieved, but time consumption and effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning effectivenessVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service tuning by automatically inferring control parameters and feature settings from measured axis properties without requiring manual engineer intervention. The knowledge base and inference unit work together to autonomously determine optimal tuning parameters based on measured data, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual trial-and-error processes while maintaining reliable tuning results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by measuring actual axis properties (such as resonance frequencies, inertias, and friction characteristics) and using these measurements to automatically adjust control parameters. The measured data feeds into the knowledge base, which then generates optimized control settings, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves tuning based on actual performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control features and parameters are available for different mechanical situations, then adaptability to various requirements is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to requirementsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The knowledge base acts as an intermediary between the measured axis properties and the control parameter selection. Instead of requiring users to directly navigate through numerous control features and parameters, the knowledge base processes the measured data and automatically infers the appropriate control settings, simplifying the user interface while maintaining access to multiple control features for different mechanical situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes control parameters based on measured axis properties. By dynamically adjusting parameters such as controller gains, filter frequencies, and compensation values according to the actual measured characteristics of each axis, the system adapts to different mechanical situations without requiring manual configuration of multiple control features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If domain experts manually document and reuse tuning findings, then knowledge accumulation is possible, but data loss and inefficiency occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge lossVSAvoidtuning productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system ensures continuous accumulation and reuse of tuning knowledge by automatically storing measured axis properties and inferred control parameters in the knowledge base. Each tuning process contributes data that becomes available for future tuning tasks, creating a continuous cycle of knowledge accumulation that improves productivity with each use without requiring manual documentation efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of tuning knowledge by automatically recording measured axis properties and corresponding optimal control parameters. These copied data sets are stored in the knowledge base and can be automatically retrieved and applied to similar axes or machines, eliminating the need for manual documentation while enabling efficient knowledge reuse across different tuning tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11675331B2Tuning of axis control of multi-axis machines
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 SIEMENS AG
  • US11675331B2 patent drawing
  • US11675331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for tuning of axis control of a multi-axis machine and a method of operating the same are provided. The system includes a knowledge base for acquiring and maintaining factual knowledge associated with the tuning of the axis control. The factual knowledge has a uniform ontology a uniform data representation, and includes known input facts associated with known output facts. The system further includes an inference unit for automatically inferring new output facts associated with given new input facts in accordance with the factual knowledge.