Axle Counter Train Dynamics for Adaptive Railroad Crossing Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for operating railroad crossings rely on additional sensor technology, which reduces reliability and introduces measurement uncertainties, and fail to adapt closure times based on the properties of approaching trains, leading to inefficient operation.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing axle counters to calculate velocity and acceleration of approaching trains, allowing for precise determination of closure times based on train properties without additional sensors, and employing pattern detection and machine learning to differentiate between passenger and freight trains for optimized closure times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If additional sensor technology is installed to detect train properties, then measurement precision improves, but reliability deteriorates due to more failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain property detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The axle counter is designed to perform multiple functions: it not only counts axles for train detection but also calculates velocity and acceleration by analyzing the timing and sequence of axle passages. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate sensors, maintaining reliability while providing comprehensive train property detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines velocity and acceleration measurement capabilities into the existing axle counter system by processing axle passage timing data. Instead of using separate velocity sensors and acceleration sensors, the system merges these measurement functions into the single axle counter, reducing the number of components and potential failure points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If closure time is extended to ensure safety for all train types, then safety improves, but loss of time increases for passenger trains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of railroad crossingVSAvoidwaiting time at railroad crossing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The closure time is made dynamic rather than static. The system calculates velocity and acceleration in real-time and uses these values to determine the appropriate closure time for each specific train. This allows the closure time to adapt to each train's actual motion characteristics, extending it only as much as necessary for safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used to determine closure time from fixed conservative estimates to dynamically calculated values based on actual train velocity and acceleration. By using real measured parameters instead of worst-case assumptions, the system optimizes closure duration to match actual safety requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If fixed closure time is used for all trains, then ease of operation improves, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of closure controlVSAvoidadaptation to different train types
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating velocity and acceleration from axle counter data and determining the appropriate closure time without requiring manual intervention or pre-programming for different train types. The system adapts to each train automatically based on its measured properties, maintaining ease of operation while achieving full adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the axle counter measurements to automatically adjust closure time decisions. By continuously monitoring axle passage timing and calculating actual velocity and acceleration, the system receives real-time feedback about train characteristics and automatically adapts the closure time accordingly, eliminating the need for manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12454296B2Method and apparatus with an axle counter for operating a railroad crossing, computer program product and delivery apparatus for the computer program product
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH
  • US12454296B2 patent drawing
  • US12454296B2 patent drawing
  • US12454296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a railroad crossing includes using an axle counter to capture measurement data for rail vehicles approaching the railroad crossing during passage of the rail vehicle. The velocity and the acceleration of the rail vehicle are calculated from the measurement data as properties of the rail vehicle by arithmetic measures. A time of closure is specified for triggering a closure of the railroad crossing as a function of the calculated properties of the rail vehicle. The velocity and the acceleration are calculated from the measurement data of the axle counter. The time of closure of the railroad crossing is specified with reference to the calculated velocity and the calculated acceleration as the rail vehicle is leaving the axle counter. An apparatus for operating a railroad crossing, a computer program product and a delivery apparatus for the computer program product are also provided.