Axle-Guided Aquaculture Cage Flipping Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current shellfish aquaculture methods are labor-intensive due to the manual removal of biofouling organisms from floating cages, and existing mechanized solutions are costly and complex, limiting their accessibility and adoption.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated cage flipping system using parallel guides close to the cage-mounted axles, integrated with a workboat, allows for efficient flipping, filling, and emptying of cages without additional structures or large platforms, utilizing a longline and specially designed cages with hollow axles and parallel guide rails for precise positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual labor is used to physically flip cages, then biofouling management is achieved, but labor intensity is extremely high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor intensityVSAvoidcage flipping efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the static cage structure into a dynamic one by introducing an axle mechanism that allows the cage to rotate 180 degrees around the axle. The cage flips from a horizontal growing position to an inverted drying position, enabling automated biofouling management without manual labor. The axle serves as a permanent rotation point that the cage pivots around during the flipping operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cage flipping system operates autonomously once positioned on the ramp. The cage uses its own weight and the ramp's inclination to flip automatically around the axle. The design eliminates the need for external actuators or complex mechanisms - the cage self-flips by rolling up the ramp and using gravity to rotate into the inverted position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If existing mechanized systems are used, then cage flipping is automated, but system cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage flipping automationVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the automation function into separate components: the workboat provides propulsion and positioning, the ramp provides the flipping mechanism, and the cage with axle provides the rotation capability. Each component performs a specific function, simplifying the overall system design compared to integrated mechanized solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The workboat serves multiple functions: it provides propulsion for moving the cage line, acts as a support platform for the ramp, and enables positioning at different locations along the aquaculture line. The ramp simultaneously serves as a flipping mechanism and a loading/unloading ramp for the cages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If existing mechanized systems are used, then cage flipping is automated, but accessibility to small farms is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage flipping automationVSAvoidsystem accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses simple, inexpensive components that can be easily manufactured or acquired. The ramp can be a simple inclined structure, the axle is a basic rotation component, and the cage modifications are minimal. This contrasts with expensive, complex mechanized systems that require significant capital investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The axle acts as an intermediary component that connects the cage to the flipping mechanism. Instead of directly attaching the cage to a complex mechanical system, the axle serves as a simple intermediate element that enables rotation while maintaining cage integrity and ease of installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If additional structures or large floating platforms are used, then cage flipping can be mechanized, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage flipping operationVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the workboat and ramp into a single integrated unit. The ramp is mounted on the workboat, combining the propulsion platform and flipping mechanism into one structure. This eliminates the need for separate floating platforms or additional support structures that would increase system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from horizontal cage manipulation to vertical flipping by utilizing the ramp's inclination. Instead of moving cages horizontally along a track or platform, the cage is flipped vertically by rolling up the inclined ramp, using gravity and the ramp's angle to achieve the position change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system reduces labor costs and enhances efficiency by allowing single-person operation, maintaining cage stability and alignment, and facilitating biofouling management through gravity-assisted flipping and filling/emptying processes, making it more accessible and cost-effective for oyster farmers.

Implementation Method 1

As the cages ascend the ramp with the axles and long line under the cages and the workboat moving parallel to the long line, the axles remain between the guides, ensuring the cages stay centered and stable. Once the cages reach the top, gravity flips the cages from the growing to the drying position.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS12102066B1Aquaculture biofouling management using axle-guided cage flipping
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 RUDNER LAWRENCE MICHAEL
  • US12102066B1 patent drawing
  • US12102066B1 patent drawing
  • US12102066B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention describes an aquaculture cage guidance system that simplifies the process of flipping and moving aquaculture cages. The system utilizes specialized cages with hollow axles that allow a longline to pass through them, enabling the cages to pivot. Parallel guide rails positioned close to the axles restrict lateral movement and ensure the cages remain centered as they move along the system. The support structure for the guide rails can be angled or horizontal, allowing the cages to be raised, lowered, or moved horizontally to facilitate operations such as flipping, filling, emptying, and harvesting.