Axle Saturation Estimation for Understeer and Oversteer Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated vehicle systems face challenges in distinguishing between understeer and oversteer situations, leading to uncomfortable passenger experiences and increased vehicle wear and tear.

Innovation Solution

A processor-based method and system that utilize IMU measurements, EPS signals, and a controller circuit to estimate axle saturation levels and determine understeer or oversteer conditions by integrating saturation levels and understeering angles, with the ability to generate commands for actuators to mitigate these situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated control systems use basic steering feedback, then steering response is simple and fast, but the system cannot accurately distinguish understeer from oversteer situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveundersteer/oversteer detection accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the vehicle dynamics into distinct components by separately estimating saturation levels for the first axle (steered) and second axle (unsteered). This segmentation allows independent analysis of each axle's contribution to understeer/oversteer conditions, improving detection accuracy while keeping the overall system manageable through modular estimation approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-axis steering analysis to a multi-dimensional approach by integrating both steered and unsteered axle saturation levels, along with IMU measurements and EPS signals. This dimensional expansion enables accurate distinction between understeer and oversteer states that single-axis systems cannot detect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the system integrates multiple sensor inputs and calculations, then understeer/oversteer determination accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaturation level estimation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary estimation of axle saturation levels using IMU measurements and EPS signals before integrating them to determine overall vehicle state. This preliminary action organizes complex calculations into manageable stages, improving accuracy while controlling computational complexity through structured processing sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously integrates saturation level estimates from both axles and uses this feedback to determine and respond to understeer/oversteer conditions. This feedback loop refines the accuracy of vehicle state determination while managing computational complexity through iterative rather than exhaustive calculation approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the system responds to understeer/oversteer situations, then passenger comfort and vehicle durability improve, but response time may be delayed due to complex analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger comfort and vehicle protectionVSAvoiddetection and response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously estimates axle saturation levels and integrates them in real-time, maintaining readiness to detect understeer/oversteer conditions without waiting for threshold violations. This preliminary continuous estimation reduces response time while maintaining the accuracy needed for reliable passenger comfort and vehicle protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses readily available IMU measurements and EPS signals that are already part of normal vehicle operation, rather than requiring additional specialized sensors. This self-service approach leverages existing system resources to provide timely detection and response, improving reliability without significant time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11987252B2Systems and methods for determining whether a vehicle is in an understeer or oversteer situation
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11987252B2 patent drawing
  • US11987252B2 patent drawing
  • US11987252B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining whether a vehicle is in an understeer or oversteer situation. The system includes a controller circuit coupled to an IMU and an EPS, and programmed to: calculate, for a steered first axle, an axle-based pneumatic trail for using IMU measurements and EPS signals and estimate a saturation level as a function of a distance between the axle-based pneumatic trail and zero. The system estimates, for an unsteered second axle, an axle lateral force curve with respect to a slip angle of the second axle, and a saturation level as a function of when the axle lateral force curve with respect to the slip angle transitions from positive values to negative values. The saturation level of the first axle and the second axle are integrated. The system determines that the vehicle is in an understeer or oversteer situation as a function of the integrated saturation levels.