Azimuthal Amplitude Gradient Estimation via Windowed Statistical Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for estimating azimuthal amplitude gradient in seismic data are limited by noise, data misalignments, and ambiguity between gradient polarity and symmetry azimuth, leading to unstable and inaccurate fracture orientation and magnitude determinations.

Innovation Solution

A windowed statistical method is employed to process 3-D seismic data by forming common image location gathers, performing linear regression, calculating joint correlations of seismic traces, and determining rotation angles to resolve symmetry azimuths, thereby stabilizing estimates and resolving ambiguity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If point-wise estimation method is used for azimuthal amplitude gradient, then calculation simplicity is maintained, but estimation stability and accuracy deteriorate due to noise and data misalignments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation simplicityVSAvoidestimation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple seismic traces within a sliding time window to perform joint correlation analysis, merging information from multiple azimuths and offsets to stabilize the gradient estimation. This pooling of data reduces the impact of noise and misalignments that plague point-wise methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses iterative optimization to refine the gradient estimates by comparing predicted and actual seismic amplitudes, adjusting parameters to minimize misfit. This feedback mechanism continuously improves estimation accuracy while accounting for noise and data quality variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If point-wise estimation method is used for azimuthal amplitude gradient, then computational speed is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to ambiguity between gradient polarity and symmetry azimuth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoidfracture orientation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines gradient estimates from multiple azimuths and offsets within a unified correlation framework, merging information that resolves the polarity ambiguity. By analyzing the joint statistical properties of traces across different geometries, the method distinguishes between true symmetry azimuths and artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from analyzing single azimuth profiles to examining the multi-dimensional joint correlation structure of traces across azimuth, offset, and time. This additional dimensional context provides the constraints needed to resolve the inherent polarity ambiguity in conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If conventional linear regression is applied to each gather separately, then processing efficiency is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to noise and data misalignments at different azimuths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidgradient estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the processing of multiple gathers by performing joint correlation analysis on traces from different azimuths and offsets simultaneously within a sliding window. This unified approach maintains computational efficiency while leveraging the complementary information across geometries to improve reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a sliding time window that dynamically adapts to local data characteristics, adjusting the analysis volume to optimize the balance between computational efficiency and estimation reliability. This dynamic approach allows efficient processing while maintaining high reliability in varying data quality conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3311201B1Seismic azimuthal gradient estimation
Publication Date: 2020.02.19 CONOCOPHILLIPS CO
  • EP3311201B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3311201B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP3311201B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~3(b)

AI summary

Method of estimating azimuthal amplitude gradient is disclosed. This method uses a correlation of seismic attributes within a sliding volume of data to obtain azimuthal gradient.