Back-End Image Processing Unit for Defective Pixel Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional digital imaging devices face issues with defective pixels, light intensity non-uniformity, noise amplification, and edge artifacts due to manufacturing defects and operational failures, which are not adequately addressed by existing image processing techniques.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a back-end image processing system with line buffers for raw pixel processing, overflow control, audio-video synchronization, and flexible memory I/O controllers to manage pixel data, correct defective pixels, reduce noise, and improve demosaicing, while also supporting various pixel formats and memory addressing modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional image processing techniques are used, then basic image processing can be performed, but defective pixels and light intensity non-uniformity cannot be adequately corrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing system is divided into front-end processing (conventional techniques) and back-end processing (defective pixel correction, light intensity correction, noise reduction, demosaicing). This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific correction tasks, improving overall image quality while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The back-end processing unit performs corrective actions in advance before final image output. Defective pixels are identified and corrected, light intensity non-uniformity is compensated, and noise is reduced before the image is displayed or stored, ensuring high reliability from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If conventional sharpening techniques are applied, then image sharpness can be improved, but noise is amplified and edges cannot be distinguished from noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge detection accuracyVSAvoidnoise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The back-end processing unit analyzes image characteristics and applies adaptive sharpening that considers local noise levels and edge strength. The system provides feedback loops that adjust sharpening parameters based on detected noise patterns, allowing edge enhancement while suppressing noise amplification through intelligent parameter control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If conventional demosaicing techniques are used, then color data can be interpolated, but edge artifacts such as aliasing and rainbow artifacts are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolor accuracyVSAvoidedge artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The demosaicing process uses dynamic thresholding and adaptive interpolation methods that adjust to local image characteristics. The system dynamically selects interpolation strategies based on detected edge orientations and strengths, preventing artifacts like aliasing and rainbow effects while maintaining accurate color reproduction in homogeneous regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a comprehensive image processing system is implemented to correct all defects, then image quality improves, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Processing tasks are segmented into front-end and back-end units that can operate in parallel. The back-end processing handles computationally intensive corrections (defective pixel correction, light intensity correction, noise reduction, demosaicing) separately from basic processing, allowing optimized resource allocation and reduced overall processing time through concurrent execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8786625B2System and method for processing image data using an image signal processor having back-end processing logic
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 APPLE INC
  • US8786625B2 patent drawing
  • US8786625B2 patent drawing
  • US8786625B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments provide for a an image signal processing system that includes back-end pixel processing unit that receives pixel data after being processed by at least one of a front-end pixel processing unit and a pixel processing pipeline. In certain embodiments, the back-end processing unit receives luma/chroma image data and may be configured to apply face detection operations, local tone mapping, bright, contrast, color adjustments, as well as scaling. Further, the back-end processing unit may also include a back-end statistics unit that may collect frequency statistics. The frequency statistics may be provided to an encoder and may be used to determine quantization parameters that are to be applied to an image frame.