Back-Gate CNFET Architecture for Sub-3 nm Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transistor technologies face challenges in scaling beyond sub-3 nm technology nodes due to increased parasitic capacitances and energy delay product (EDP) degradation, necessitating the development of new nanomaterial-based solutions to maintain energy efficiency and reduce manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

The development of back-gate carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (CNFETs) with a contacted gate pitch (CGP) of 30 nm or less, featuring a channel with a source and drain on one side and a gate on the opposite side, which reduces parasitic capacitance and allows for scaling to sub-3 nm technology nodes while maintaining energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional top-gate and gate-all-around FET architectures are used, then manufacturing is straightforward, but parasitic capacitances increase and EDP degrades when scaling below sub-3 nm nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy delay product (EDP)VSAvoidtransistor architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional gate positioning by placing the gate at the back (opposite side) of the channel rather than at the front or surrounding it. This back-gate configuration reduces parasitic capacitances between the gate and source/drain regions, thereby improving EDP while maintaining manufacturability through modified existing fabrication processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Productivity

If contacted gate pitch (CGP) is reduced to scale transistors to smaller technology nodes, then transistor density increases, but parasitic capacitances increase and EDP benefits are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor densityVSAvoidparasitic capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the gate on the opposite side of the channel from the source and drain contacts, effectively utilizing the vertical/dimensional space rather than lateral spacing. This allows CGP to be reduced for higher density while the gate remains spatially separated from source/drain, minimizing parasitic capacitance coupling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If physical spacing between metal gate and metal source/drain is reduced, then transistor area decreases, but parasitic capacitances increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor areaVSAvoidparasitic capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting the gate position to the back side of the channel, the patent enables reduced transistor area through smaller spacing while the gate remains physically separated from source/drain regions, preventing parasitic capacitance increase that would normally accompany reduced spacing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS11626486B2Back-gate field-effect transistors and methods for making the same
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 ANALOG DEVICES INC
  • US11626486B2 patent drawing
  • US11626486B2 patent drawing
  • US11626486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A back-gate carbon nanotube field effect transistor (CNFETs) provides: (1) reduced parasitic capacitance, which decreases the energy-delay product (EDP) thus improving the energy efficiency of digital systems (e.g., very-large-scale integrated circuits) and (2) scaling of transistors to smaller technology nodes (e.g., sub-3 nm nodes). An exemplary back-gate CNFET includes a channel. A source and a drain are disposed on a first side of the channel. A gate is disposed on a second side of the channel opposite to the first side. In this manner, the contacted gate pitch (CGP) of the back-gate CNFET may be scaled down without scaling the physical gate length (LG) or contact length (LC). The gate may also overlap with the source and/or the drain in this architecture. In one example, an exemplary CNFET was demonstrated to have a CGP less than 30 nm and 1.6× improvement to EDP compared to top-gate CNFETs.