Back-Moulded Insert Edge Bending for Injection Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing back-injection molding methods require complex and costly post-processing to fold and fasten protruding inserts, as the edge play between the mold and insert can be too large or too small, leading to damage or fold formation in the visible area of the component.

Innovation Solution

The method involves inserting the insert with a protruding edge that encloses an angle greater than zero degrees with the mold or slide, allowing the mold core to bend the edge over during closure, eliminating the need for post-processing by ensuring the edge is flush within the cavity, and using elastic or plastic materials to allow the insert to protrude beyond the matrix.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the edge play is made larger to prevent compression of the insert, then the insert can be inserted more easily without damage, but the plastic overmoulds the insert in the fold area and prevents or damages the subsequent fold over

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert insertion easeVSAvoidfold area precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The insert edge is pre-positioned to protrude beyond the mold edge before injection, creating a predetermined geometry that enables self-folding during mold closure. This preliminary positioning eliminates the need for post-processing folding operations while avoiding plastic overmolding issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of trying to prevent the insert from protruding or folding it after injection, the invention inverts the approach by designing the mold to intentionally allow protrusion and using the mold closure itself to perform the folding action, transforming a potential defect into a functional feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Manufacturing precision

If the edge play is made tighter to prevent plastic escaping, then the fold over can be achieved, but the insert is compressed during insertion causing folds in the visible area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefold over precisionVSAvoidinsert insertion ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mold design incorporates localized features at the edge region, specifically allowing the insert edge to protrude beyond the mold edge in a controlled manner. This local geometric modification enables the insert to be received without compression while still achieving proper fold-over during closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If post-processing is used to fold and fasten protruding inserts, then the component quality is improved, but the production time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent qualityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the insert insertion, molding, and insert folding operations into a single integrated injection molding process. The insert edge protrudes during injection and is automatically folded over during mold closure, combining multiple operations that would otherwise require separate post-processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mold structure itself performs the folding function during closure, with the cavity geometry guiding the insert edge to fold over automatically. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external folding equipment or manual post-processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If film clamps are used to fix the insert in the tool, then the insert positioning is improved, but the device complexity and additional components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert positioning precisionVSAvoidtool complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the film clamp component entirely from the tooling system. Instead of using clamps to hold the insert, the design relies on the insert edge geometry and mold closure mechanics to achieve proper positioning and folding, simplifying the overall tool structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2554352B2Method for producing a back-moulded part
Publication Date: 2020.08.19 GEORG KAUFMANN FORMENBAU
  • EP2554352B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2554352B2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2554352B2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The method involves inserting an insert portion (4) into a die (7) in a splashing behind or foaming behind manner, such that an edge (6) of the insert portion projects over the edge of the die or a die sided slide (1) or a frame. The tool is closed, such that a cavity is formed between the mold core (2) and the die. The cavity is filled with a molding material or a foam. The projecting edge of the mold core is bent in the direction of the die.