Back support for pedal-driven devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing back supports for pedal-driven devices, such as bicycles, lack adjustable and ergonomic designs that accommodate dynamic weight shifts and provide optimal counter-pressure, leading to discomfort and instability during use.

Innovation Solution

A back support system featuring articulated contact bodies connected via an L-shaped or I-shaped bracket to a holder, allowing for adjustable positioning and rotation, which includes spherical or cylindrical contact bodies that can pivot to match the rider's back, ensuring ergonomic fit and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional seatposts with fixed contact elements are used, then the structure is simple, but the ergonomic adjustment capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic adjustment capabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The contact element is designed with articulation capabilities allowing it to pivot and adjust dynamically. The contact element can rotate around a contact element axis and the bracket can pivot relative to the mount, transforming a static structure into a dynamic one that adapts to rider positioning needs while maintaining reasonable structural simplicity through controlled degrees of freedom

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The back support system is divided into separable components: a mount that attaches to the seatpost, a bracket that pivots on the mount, and contact elements that articulate on the bracket. This segmentation allows independent adjustment of each component and enables easy removal or reconfiguration, improving ergonomic adaptability without requiring complete structural redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the contact element is fixed relative to the bracket, then the structure is stable, but the ability to accommodate dynamic weight shifts is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidaccommodation of dynamic weight shifts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The contact element incorporates articulation mechanisms that allow it to pivot and rotate in response to dynamic loads. The bracket can pivot on the mount and the contact element can articulate on the bracket, creating a kinematic chain that naturally adapts to weight shifts while maintaining stable support through controlled movement rather than rigid fixation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows change in geometric parameters (angles and positions) of the bracket and contact element relative to each other and to the mount. This enables the structure to dynamically adjust its configuration in response to varying rider positions and weight distributions, maintaining optimal support stability across different riding conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the bracket is made heavier for increased stability, then the stability improves, but the overall weight of the device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidoverall weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a heavy rigid bracket, the invention employs a lighter bracket with pivot and articulation capabilities. The dynamic adjustment mechanisms allow a lighter structure to achieve stability through adaptive positioning and counter-pressure generation, rather than relying solely on mass for stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The bracket's geometric parameters (lengths, angles, pivot positions) can be optimized to achieve maximum stability with minimum weight. The articulated design allows the same bracket to provide stable support across multiple configurations, reducing the need for over-engineering with heavier materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If the contact element is articulated and adjustable, then the ergonomic fit improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic fitVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The contact element uses simple pivot and articulation joints rather than complex adjustment mechanisms. These passive dynamic joints allow the contact element to automatically adapt to rider positioning through gravity and applied forces, providing ergonomic fit without requiring active adjustment systems, motors, or complex locking mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The articulated contact element automatically adjusts to the rider's back position through its own geometry and the forces applied during use. The pivot and articulation points allow the structure to self-position for optimal ergonomic contact without requiring user intervention or complex control systems, simplifying the overall adjustment mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3972891B1Back support for pedal-driven devices
Publication Date: 2023.05.24 B&T INNOTEC GERMANY GMBH
  • EP3972891B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP3972891B1 patent drawingFigure 6~11
  • EP3972891B1 patent drawingFigure 12

AI summary

The invention relates to a back support (1) for pedal-driven devices with a mount (2) for fastening to a device and a contact part (4) arranged thereon for supporting a person using the device, wherein: the contact part (4) is articulated to the mount (2); the contact part (4) has a plurality of contact elements (6, 23, 24) and an arm (7, 20) by means of which the contact elements (23, 24) are connected to one another and which is articulated to the mount (2); at least one contact element (6, 23, 24) is a ball (31, 32) or a roller (26, 27) and is connected to the arm (7, 20) so as to rotate about a contact element axis (9, 28, 29).