Backend Session Import Wrapping for Fine-Grained Performance Profiling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual performance profiling in software development is costly, prone to errors, and provides coarse-grained results, making it difficult to identify performance bottlenecks accurately, especially when nested functions are not accessible to the developer.

Innovation Solution

An automated performance profiling system that intercepts import requests during backend sessions, wrapping software modules with profiling functions to measure performance data with fine granularity, including execution times and function calls, without altering production code.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual performance profiling statements are added to code, then performance data can be collected, but the effort and cost increase significantly and the results are coarse-grained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance measurement granularityVSAvoidprofiling setup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically instruments and profiles functions without requiring manual intervention. The profiler intercepts function calls dynamically, creating self-service profiling where the system profiles itself and its dependencies automatically, eliminating the need for developers to manually add profiling statements to code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary instrumentation by intercepting function calls before execution and automatically setting up profiling infrastructure. This preliminary action includes capturing function signatures, creating virtualized function wrappers, and establishing measurement points before the actual function execution occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If profiling statements are added to nested functions, then fine-grained performance data can be obtained, but the code complexity and maintenance burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenested function performance dataVSAvoidcode modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The profiler automatically instruments nested functions by intercepting their calls through the virtualized function mechanism. When a function calls another function, the interceptor automatically creates a nested profiling structure without requiring modifications to the original code, allowing fine-grained measurement of nested function performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer (virtualized function interceptor) between the original function calls and the execution. This intermediary captures call graphs, creates virtual wrappers that include profiling logic, and enables fine-grained measurement of nested functions without modifying the original function implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If performance profiling is implemented automatically, then analysis time is reduced, but computation overhead and code bloat increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance analysis timeVSAvoidcomputation overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial instrumentation by selectively profiling only the functions that are actually called during execution, rather than instrumenting all possible functions. The virtualized function mechanism only creates profiling wrappers for functions that are dynamically invoked, reducing unnecessary computation overhead while maintaining comprehensive profiling capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The profiling infrastructure is dynamic rather than static. The virtualized function interceptor only activates profiling mechanisms when functions are actually called, allowing the system to adapt its behavior based on runtime conditions. This dynamic approach enables comprehensive profiling when needed while minimizing overhead during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250348401A1Automatic Performance Profiling of Backend Sessions
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 SAP SE
  • US20250348401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348401A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated performance profiling can be performed for software modules imported during a backend session of a software platform. An import request for an entity (e.g., a requested function or requested class) received from a client application during the backend session can be intercepted by an automatic performance profiling process which wraps a software module implementing the entity with profiling. The request can include an indication to enhance the entity with profiling. Responsive to the request, the server identifies and imports the software module implementing the entity with a software engine and determines whether the software module includes profiling. If the software module does not yet include profiling, the server transforms the requested entity into a profiling-enhanced entity by wrapping the requested entity with profiling. The profiling-enhanced entity is then output to fulfill the request.