Backflow Prevention in Fluidized Bed Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Biological fluidized bed reactors experience backflow issues during power interruptions, leading to clogged nozzles and non-uniform flow distribution, which results in costly downtime and maintenance due to the need for complete disassembly of the flow distributor.

Innovation Solution

A backflow prevention system utilizing a vacuum relief valve, check valve, and air release valve is integrated into the feed conduit, positioned above the fluid level, to introduce gas and reduce vacuum, preventing media particles from backing up into the nozzles and ensuring uniform flow distribution upon pump reactivation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a pump delivers influent into the reactor vessel during power interruption, then the influent flow continues, but media particles backflow through the nozzles and clog them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackflow preventionVSAvoidflow distributor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow distributor is divided into multiple removable modules, each containing a set of nozzles. This segmentation allows individual modules to be easily removed and cleaned without disassembling the entire flow distributor, reducing maintenance complexity while preventing backflow clogging of all nozzles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A check valve is introduced as an intermediary component in the influent line to prevent media particles from backflowing through the nozzles during power interruptions. The check valve acts as a mediator that allows normal influent flow while blocking reverse flow of media particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of repair

If the flow distributor is disassembled for repair to eliminate media particle obstruction, then nozzle clogging is resolved, but reactor downtime and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow distributor maintenanceVSAvoidreactor downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The flow distributor is segmented into multiple removable modules that can be independently accessed and cleaned. This allows maintenance personnel to quickly remove and clean specific modules without disassembling the entire flow distributor, significantly reducing maintenance time and reactor downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The check valve is pre-installed in the influent line to prevent media particle backflow and nozzle clogging before they occur. This preliminary protective action eliminates the need for frequent disassembly and cleaning of the flow distributor, reducing overall maintenance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If influent surges through unobstructed nozzles at higher velocity, then flow distribution becomes non-uniform, but nozzle abrasion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow distribution uniformityVSAvoidnozzle abrasion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A check valve is introduced as an intermediary component to prevent media particles from backflowing through the nozzles during power interruptions. This eliminates the root cause of non-uniform flow distribution and prevents the subsequent high-velocity surge that causes nozzle abrasion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically responds to power interruptions by automatically preventing media particle backflow through the check valve. This dynamic protection mechanism maintains uniform flow distribution upon pump reactivation and prevents the damaging high-velocity surge conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively limits backflow without the need for electrical or pneumatic power sources, reducing maintenance costs and ensuring consistent operation by using passive components that rely on fluid mechanics, thus enhancing efficiency and dependability.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum relief valve coupled to said feed conduit to introduce gas into the feed conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum relief: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a check valve coupled to the feed conduit to limit backflow of fluid in the feed conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCheck valve flow control: Valve

Implementation Method 3

An air release valve is coupled to the feed conduit to exhaust gas from the feed conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir release: Valve

Implementation Method 4

a feed conduit extending between a pump and a vessel, wherein at least a portion of the feed conduit is positioned at an elevation above a level of fluid in the vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS7754159B2System and method for limiting backflow in a biological fluidized bed reactor
Publication Date: 2010.07.13 HSBC BANK
  • US7754159B2 patent drawing
  • US7754159B2 patent drawing
  • US7754159B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluidized bed reactor configured for reduced backflow of fluid is provided. The fluidized bed reactor comprises a vessel configured to contain a level of fluid, a feed conduit positioned to deliver feed into the vessel from an elevation above the level of fluid and a vacuum relief valve coupled to said feed conduit to introduce gas into the feed conduit.