Backpack Blower Layout for Rear Air Intake and Weight Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional backpack blowers, especially gas-powered ones, face inefficiencies due to limited air intake size and the need for fuel storage, which affects performance and environmental impact, while battery-powered blowers struggle with weight distribution and user fatigue.

Innovation Solution

A battery-powered backpack blower design with a rear-mounted volute assembly and strategically positioned battery and motor housing to optimize air intake and balance mass, reducing torque forces and enhancing user comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the fan air intake is positioned on the side of the blower, then the blower can be compact, but the air intake vent size is limited which reduces airflow rate and blower performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair intake vent sizeVSAvoidairflow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The volute assembly is inverted so that the fan air intake faces rearward instead of forward or sideways. This allows the air intake to be positioned at the rear of the blower where it can be much larger, thereby increasing the airflow rate while maintaining a compact overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Productivity

If the battery is positioned to optimize airflow, then air intake efficiency improves, but weight distribution becomes unbalanced increasing user fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair intake efficiencyVSAvoiduser fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The blower components are asymmetrically arranged with the volute assembly positioned on one side of the battery. This asymmetric configuration allows the air intake to be optimized for airflow while the counterbalancing effect of the volute assembly helps distribute the weight more evenly, reducing user fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Power

If gas-powered blowers are used, then high power is achieved, but emissions are released and fuel storage is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblower powerVSAvoidemissions
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The internal combustion engine is replaced with an electric motor powered by a battery. This substitution eliminates the mechanical combustion process that produces emissions, while the electric motor provides sufficient power for the blower application without requiring fuel storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design improves airflow efficiency, reduces user fatigue, and minimizes environmental impact by providing a balanced and efficient operation with a larger air intake area and better weight distribution.

Implementation Method 1

a fan member to generate air flow therethrough

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFan: Fan

Data Source

PatentEP3061375B1Battery powered backpack blower
Publication Date: 2018.10.31 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • EP3061375B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3061375B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3061375B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The battery- powered backpack blower includes a back support assembly including a back plate configured to permit a user to mount the blower to the user's back, and a volute assembly including a first volute portion and a second volute portion. The backpack blower further includes a housing assembly including a battery assembly and a motor assembly therein, the housing assembly is provided intermediate to the back assembly and the volute assembly.