Multi-Container Backpack Sprayer Manifold for Chemical Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manual pump-operated backpack sprayers face challenges with durability, reliability, and cross-contamination issues, particularly when switching between different chemicals, as they require draining and refilling, and residual chemicals can remain, leading to ineffective applications and increased costs due to the need for separate sprayers.

Innovation Solution

A portable backpack-style manual-pump-operated sprayer with multiple modular chemical containers and an operator-controlled manifold assembly that allows for easy selection and back-flushing of chemicals, preventing cross-contamination by returning residual chemicals to their original containers, thus eliminating the need for frequent washing and reducing the risk of mixing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single chemical container is used in conventional backpack sprayers, then the device structure is simple, but cross-contamination occurs when switching between different chemicals requiring draining and refilling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical switching capabilityVSAvoidcontainer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sprayer system is divided into multiple independent chemical containers (first container, second container) that can be independently filled and emptied. Each container has its own connection to the common pump, allowing separate chemical management without cross-contamination when switching between chemicals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The common pump and spray mechanism serve multiple chemical containers universally. The same pumping system, pressure regulator, and spray wand can handle different chemicals from different containers, eliminating the need for separate sprayers for different chemicals while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If residual chemicals remain in the sprayer after application, then the device maintains pressure and flow continuity, but cross-contamination and ineffective applications occur when switching chemicals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication effectivenessVSAvoidcross-contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Residual chemicals are extracted from the system by draining each container separately back into its original container. The first container drains into a first receiving container, and the second container drains into a second receiving container, removing residual chemicals that would cause cross-contamination while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary draining of residual chemicals before chemical switching occurs. By draining containers back to receiving containers in advance, the system prevents cross-contamination before it can occur during the next chemical application, ensuring application effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If frequent washing and refilling are required to prevent cross-contamination, then cross-contamination is minimized, but operational complexity and time loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical switching efficiencyVSAvoidtime for draining and refilling
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple chemical containers and receiving containers are merged into a single integrated sprayer system with a common pump and shared spray mechanism. This allows simultaneous management of multiple chemicals without requiring separate sprayers, reducing the time and complexity of chemical switching operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically draining residual chemicals back into their original containers through the receiving containers. This eliminates the need for manual washing and refilling operations, significantly reducing the time and operational complexity associated with chemical switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If separate sprayers are maintained for different chemicals to avoid cross-contamination, then cross-contamination is eliminated, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical purityVSAvoidnumber of sprayer units
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single sprayer system with a common pump, pressure regulator, and spray wand serves multiple chemical containers universally. The same mechanical components can handle different chemicals by simply switching which container is active, maintaining chemical purity without requiring multiple separate sprayer units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The chemical storage is segmented into multiple independent containers while the delivery system remains unified. Each chemical container is independent and can be filled, drained, and switched separately, but all containers feed into the same pump and spray system, eliminating the need for multiple complete sprayer units while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a durable, reliable, and efficient sprayer that allows for seamless switching between chemicals without cross-contamination, reducing waste and operational complexity, while maintaining consistent pressure and flow, thus enhancing user convenience and safety.

Implementation Method 1

The container is equipped with a manual pump and pumping lever for pressurizing chemical to the pressure chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectManual pumping: Pump

Implementation Method 2

the chemical-holding tank is equipped with a manual pump and pumping lever for pressurizing chemical to the pressure chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure storage: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS9079200B2Multi-container backpack style sprayer
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 FORNARO ROSS MARK
  • US9079200B2 patent drawing
  • US9079200B2 patent drawing
  • US9079200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-container manual-pump-operated backpack sprayer including an open-topped backpack enclosure, a plurality (preferably three) modular liquid containers removably seated in the enclosure, a hand-lever-operated pump/accumulator combination, and a user-controllable manifold for selecting a particular chemical from the containers for administration through a spray wand. Chemical is carried to the pressure chamber by manually pumping. The pump draws liquid from a manifold-selected supply container outward through tubes to the manifold, which has a console of valves. Separate return tubes are provided for each chemical from the manifold back to the containers of origin, and the manifold allows convenient flushing of each chemical back to its container of origin. This ensures that chemicals are not mixed or cross-contaminated and avoids waste since all residual is returned back to its respective container. The manifold is conveniently carried at the hip for ease of access.