Backside Power Rail Integration With Local Interconnect for Low-Delay Cells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor device designs lack integration of backside power rails and power distribution networks with local interconnects, leading to high resistance bottlenecks and circuit delay issues due to tight metal pitches and smaller vias.

Innovation Solution

The integration of backside power rails between N channel and P channel field effect transistor spaces, along with backside local signal lines between these power rails, forms a semiconductor device that reduces resistance by utilizing backside metal in a standard cell architecture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If tight metal pitches and smaller vias are used to increase integration density, then device integration is improved, but resistance increases causing performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidcircuit performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces backside power rails and signal lines on the opposite side of the substrate from the frontside metal interconnects. This adds a new dimensional layer (backside vs. frontside) for power distribution and signaling, allowing current to flow through shorter paths with lower resistance while maintaining high integration density on the frontside.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The power distribution network is segmented into frontside metal interconnects for high-density routing and backside power rails for low-resistance power delivery. This segmentation allows each layer to optimize for its specific function: the frontside for integration density and the backside for electrical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If backside power rails are positioned between N channel and P channel transistors, then space utilization is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The backside power rails are merged with the substrate structure itself, utilizing the same fabrication processes that create the transistors and other device features. This integration approach combines power delivery functionality with the existing device architecture without requiring separate manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The backside power rails are strategically positioned in specific locations between N channel and P channel transistors where space is available and electrical performance is most beneficial. This localized placement optimizes space utilization while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through targeted structuring in high-value regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240120256A1Backside BPR/BSPDN Intergration with Backside Local Interconnect.
Publication Date: 2024.04.11 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240120256A1 patent drawing
  • US20240120256A1 patent drawing
  • US20240120256A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device includes backside power rails located between N channel field effect transistor to N channel field effect transistor spaces, and between at least one P channel field effect transistor to P channel field effect transistor space; and backside local signal lines located between the backside power rails.