Backside Power Feedthroughs for Maskless Inline Circuit Edits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic processing technologies are inefficient for inline circuit edits, requiring the fabrication of new masks for each edit iteration, which prolongs production time and limits flexibility in making design changes across a wafer and field.

Innovation Solution

Implementing maskless e-beam lithography for inline circuit editing, allowing for edits to be made without interrupting production flow by creating access points to transistors and routing backside power delivery, thereby reducing the need for new masks and enabling faster prototyping and debug cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional lithographic processing is used for inline circuit edits, then new masks must be fabricated for each edit iteration, but this prolongs production time and reduces flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in making design changesVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the lithography step from the mask-dependent process chain by implementing maskless lithography. This allows circuit edits to be performed directly on the wafer without requiring new mask fabrication, thereby eliminating the time-consuming mask production step while maintaining design change flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining access points to transistors and routing structures during the initial fabrication process. These pre-established access points enable subsequent inline circuit edits to be performed quickly without requiring new masks, thus reducing production time while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If new masks are fabricated for each edit iteration, then design changes can be made, but this increases manufacturing complexity and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to make design changesVSAvoidmask fabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the mask fabrication step from the circuit edit process by implementing maskless lithography. This eliminates the complexity and cost associated with mask manufacturing while preserving the ability to make design changes through direct wafer processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses digital design data to directly pattern the wafer through maskless lithography, replacing the physical mask copy process. This digital-to-wafer direct translation eliminates the need for physical mask fabrication and reduces manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If conventional lithography is used for circuit edits, then production flow must be interrupted, but this reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidproduction interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining access points and routing structures during initial fabrication. This allows subsequent circuit edits to be performed as quick overlay processes without interrupting the main production flow, thereby maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous production flow by performing circuit edits as overlay processes that do not require stopping the fabrication line. The maskless lithography approach allows edits to be integrated into the existing production sequence, maintaining continuous useful action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces turnaround time for logic repair and debug, allows for parallel testing of multiple solutions on a single wafer, and eliminates the need for dedicated whitespace, thereby enhancing productivity and reducing production time by weeks compared to conventional methods.

Implementation Method 1

forming a conductive feedthrough structure using a maskless lithography process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron Beam: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS20230369222A1Inline circuit edit for backside power delivery
Publication Date: 2023.11.16 INTEL CORP
  • US20230369222A1 patent drawing
  • US20230369222A1 patent drawing
  • US20230369222A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Lithographic methodologies involving, and apparatuses suitable for, inline circuit edits are described. In an example, an integrated circuit structure includes a device layer including a plurality of transistor structures. A front-end routing layer is above the device layer, the front-end routing layer coupled to one or more of the plurality of transistors. A backside metal structure is below the device layer. A conductive feedthrough structure is directly coupling the backside metal structure to the front-end routing layer. The conductive feedthrough structure is a monolithic structure extending through the device layer.