Back-Side Power Rail Interconnects With 2D Monolayer Contacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrated chips face challenges with high voltage drops, high resistance, low reliability, and increased RC delay due to small metal source/drain contact and wire dimensions, high resistivity of copper wires, and high capacitance, leading to electromigration and time-dependent dielectric breakdown issues.

Innovation Solution

The use of a stack of conductive monolayers, such as graphene or transition metal dichalcogenides, for the source/drain contact and wire, which allows for larger dimensions, lower resistivity, higher current density, and reduced capacitance, thereby reducing voltage drops, resistance, and RC delay while enhancing reliability and dielectric breakdown resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If copper wires are used for interconnects, then electrical conductivity is improved, but voltage drops and resistance increase due to high resistivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidvoltage drops
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from copper to graphene, which has fundamentally different electrical properties. Graphene's superior electrical conductivity and lower resistivity directly reduce voltage drops and resistance, resolving the contradiction between maintaining conductivity and reducing energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structure where graphene is integrated with existing semiconductor interconnect architectures. This composite approach combines the low resistivity of graphene with the structural benefits of traditional interconnect designs, achieving reduced voltage drops while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Length of moving object

If metal source/drain contact dimensions are reduced, then device scaling is improved, but resistance increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact dimensionsVSAvoidelectrical reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition of source/drain contacts from traditional metals to graphene. This parameter change enables smaller contact dimensions while maintaining low resistance because graphene's intrinsic electrical properties compensate for the reduced cross-sectional area, thus improving scaling without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes traditional metal-based electrical contacts with a graphene-based system. This substitution replaces the mechanical and electrical properties of metals with those of a two-dimensional material, enabling reduced dimensions while maintaining or improving electrical performance and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Area of moving object

If wire dimensions are reduced, then integration density is improved, but RC delay increases due to higher resistance and capacitance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire areaVSAvoidRC delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the interconnect material from copper to graphene, fundamentally altering the resistance parameter. Graphene's lower resistivity compensates for reduced wire dimensions, while its atomic thickness reduces capacitance. This parameter change enables smaller wire areas without increasing RC delay, thus improving integration density while maintaining signal speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from three-dimensional bulk metal wires to a two-dimensional graphene structure. This dimensionality change reduces the effective capacitance by minimizing the wire's interaction with surrounding dielectric materials, while the high in-plane conductivity of graphene maintains low resistance even at reduced dimensions, thereby reducing RC delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If copper wire resistivity is high, then manufacturing is simplified, but electromigration and dielectric breakdown occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidelectromigration resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from copper to graphene, which has fundamentally superior electrical and mechanical properties. Graphene's high electron mobility and strength prevent electromigration, while its stability reduces dielectric breakdown risks. This parameter change maintains manufacturing feasibility through established CVD techniques while dramatically improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes copper-based interconnects with a graphene-based system. This substitution replaces the electromigration-prone metal with a two-dimensional material that exhibits superior resistance to electromigration and dielectric breakdown, thereby improving reliability while maintaining ease of manufacture through scalable deposition methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution results in lower voltage drops, reduced RC delay, improved reliability, and enhanced time-dependent dielectric breakdown resistance, addressing the limitations of traditional copper-based interconnects by utilizing two-dimensional materials with low resistivity and high current densities.

Implementation Method 1

The use of a stack of conductive monolayers, such as graphene or transition metal dichalcogenides, for the source/drain contact and wire, which allows for larger dimensions, lower resistivity, higher current density

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS20240379527A1Integrated chip having a back-side power rail
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20240379527A1 patent drawing
  • US20240379527A1 patent drawing
  • US20240379527A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to an integrated chip including a semiconductor device. The semiconductor device includes a first source/drain structure, a second source/drain structure, a stack of channel structures, and a gate structure. The stack of channel structures and the gate structure are between the first and second source/drain structures. The gate structure surrounds the stack of channel structures. A first conductive wire overlies and is spaced from the semiconductor device. The first conductive wire includes a first stack of conductive layers. A first conductive contact extends through a dielectric layer from the first conductive wire to the first source/drain structure. The first conductive contact is on a back-side of the first source/drain structure.