Backside Integrated Spiral Inductor Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for fabricating integrated spiral inductors face challenges in achieving high Q-factor, high self-resonance frequency, and reduced silicon area consumption while minimizing substrate loss, often resulting in reliability issues and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

The method involves performing a standard front-side CMOS manufacturing process, permanently bonding a high-resistivity carrier wafer to the semiconductor wafer, thinning the silicon substrate, removing the semiconductor substrate under the inductor area, and filling the gap with dielectric material, followed by forming the spiral inductor on the backside and connecting it to CMOS circuits through through-silicon vias.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a solid ground shield is inserted between the inductor coil and silicon substrate, then substrate loss is reduced, but eddy currents are generated in the shield lowering the Q-factor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate lossVSAvoidQ-factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the problematic silicon substrate material from the region underneath the inductor coil by etching a trench and removing the substrate, thereby eliminating the source of substrate loss without introducing a ground shield that would generate eddy currents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dielectric material as an intermediary substance to fill the etched trench, providing electrical isolation and maintaining mechanical support while preventing direct contact between the inductor coil and conductive substrate that would cause loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a patterned ground shield is used to suppress eddy currents, then Q-factor is improved, but additional parasitic capacitance is generated lowering the SRF

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQ-factorVSAvoidself-resonance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the ground shield structure entirely and instead extracts the conductive substrate material from underneath the inductor, eliminating both the eddy current problem and the parasitic capacitance issue simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Speed

If a thick dielectric layer is inserted between the inductor and substrate, then parasitic capacitance is reduced, but additional process steps are required increasing manufacturing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-resonance frequencyVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the trench etching step with the standard CMOS fabrication process flow, performing the substrate removal and dielectric filling during normal manufacturing operations rather than requiring separate additional process steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of energy

If the inductor is placed on a thick polyimide layer, then substrate loss is reduced, but the method requires additional process steps not part of standard CMOS fabrication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate lossVSAvoidfabrication process compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical and electrical parameters of the substrate region underneath the inductor by removing the conductive silicon material and replacing it with a non-conductive dielectric material, thereby reducing substrate loss while maintaining compatibility with standard CMOS fabrication processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces substrate loss, enhances Q-factor and self-resonance frequency, and minimizes silicon area consumption, while simplifying the inductor's design and reducing noise coupling, thereby improving the performance and reliability of the integrated spiral inductor.

Implementation Method 1

permanently bonding a high-resistivity carrier wafer to the semiconductor wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistivity: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

filling the gap with dielectric material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric property: Dielectric

Implementation Method 3

connecting it to CMOS circuits through through-silicon vias

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentEP3847695B1Method of fabrication of an integrated spiral inductor having low substrate loss
Publication Date: 2024.11.13 LFOUNDRY
  • EP3847695B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3847695B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3847695B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

After finishing of the front side CMOS manufacturing process, the silicon wafer is permanently bonded with its front side onto a carrier wafer. The carrier wafer is a high resistivity silicon wafer or a wafer of a dielectric or of a ceramic material. The silicon substrate of the device wafer is thinned from the back side such that the remaining silicon0thickness is only a few micrometers. In the area dedicated to a spiral inductor, the substrate material is entirely removed by a masked etching process and the resulting gap is filled with a dielectric material. A spiral inductor coil is formed on the backside of the wafer on top of the dielectric material. The inductor coil is connected to the CMOS circuits on the front side by through-silicon vias.