Incremental Backup Free Block Map Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing block-based incremental backup methods face a trade-off between resource consumption and performance, as they either require tracking all changed blocks persistently, impacting resources, or necessitate full backups after system reboots/crashes if changes are not logged persistently.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a persistently stored free block map to track only modified blocks not in the previous backup, using an in-memory change block log to mark blocks as 'modified' and propagate changes to a persistently stored log, allowing incremental backups without tracking all writes post-reboot/crash.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all changed blocks are tracked in a persistently-stored log, then incremental backups can be performed after system reboot or crash, but resource consumption increases and performance may be impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup reliability after rebootVSAvoidbackup performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the backup tracking mechanism into two parts: an in-memory change block log for active tracking and a persistently-stored free block map for recovery. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability by persisting only the free block map while using the in-memory log for performance-critical operations, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by maintaining a persistently-stored free block map that records the state of free blocks before backup operations. This preliminary record allows the system to recover and continue incremental backups after reboots without requiring full persistent tracking of all changes, thereby maintaining reliability while preserving performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If all changed blocks are tracked in a persistently-stored log, then complete backup tracking is achieved, but storage resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup tracking completenessVSAvoidstorage resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for backup recovery - the free block map - and stores it persistently, while leaving the detailed change block tracking in memory. This extraction approach achieves complete backup tracking reliability by preserving the free block state while minimizing persistent storage consumption by not storing all individual change blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If no persistent tracking is implemented, then resource consumption is reduced, but full backup operations are required after system reboot or crash

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidbackup time after reboot
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-computing and persistently storing the free block map, which captures the state of free blocks at the time of backup. This preliminary persistent record enables the system to resume incremental backups quickly after reboots without requiring full backups, thus reducing time loss while maintaining resource efficiency by not implementing full persistent change tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If in-memory change block logging is used without persistent storage, then performance is maintained, but backup continuity after crash is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup operation speedVSAvoidbackup continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the logging system into an in-memory change block log for performance and a persistently-stored free block map for reliability. The in-memory log maintains backup operation speed by avoiding persistent I/O for each change, while the persistent free block map ensures backup continuity by providing a recovery point after crashes, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10402279B2Optimization to permit block based incremental backup across system reboot or crash
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10402279B2 patent drawing
  • US10402279B2 patent drawing
  • US10402279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques to back up data are disclosed. In various embodiments, a copy of a free block map as of a first time associated with a first backup is stored in persistent data storage. Writes made subsequent to the first backup to blocks not listed as free in the copy of the free block map as of the first time are tracked in a persistently-stored change block tracking log. A free block map as of a second time and the previously-stored copy of the free block map as of the first time are used to determine which blocks listed as free in the free block map as of the first time have been written to since the first time. At least a subset of blocks determined to have been written to since the first time are including in an incremental backup.