Anomaly Detection for Backup Recovery Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for restoring computer systems after malware or ransomware attacks are time-consuming and complex, requiring significant operator skill to identify and prioritize recovery nodes effectively, and often fail to ensure a clean recovery environment due to the presence of undetected ransomware in back-up copies.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that uses pattern matching algorithms to classify back-up data as anomalous based on historical data, prioritizes recovery of machines with higher infection likelihood, and employs antivirus scanning in a quarantined environment to ensure clean recovery points are used, allowing for efficient and secure restoration of machines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual identification and prioritization of recovery nodes is performed, then operator control and decision-making capability are maintained, but recovery time and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery effectivenessVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated analysis of backup data to identify infection patterns and prioritize recovery nodes without requiring manual operator intervention. The computer-implemented method automatically scans backup copies, detects anomalies indicating malware presence, and generates prioritization recommendations, allowing the system to serve itself in the recovery decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis processes with automated computer-based analysis. Instead of operators manually examining backup data and making prioritization decisions, the system uses automated scanning, pattern recognition, and anomaly detection algorithms to perform these functions, substituting human cognitive and manual labor with computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive scanning of all backup copies is performed, then detection accuracy for infected machines is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfection detection accuracyVSAvoidscanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs scanning of backup copies in a prioritized sequence based on infection likelihood, rather than scanning all copies equally. It focuses computational resources on the most suspicious backups first, performing partial scanning initially and only expanding to comprehensive scanning of high-priority targets if needed, thus achieving good detection accuracy without processing every single backup copy to full depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different scanning intensities and methods to different backup copies based on their individual risk profiles. High-priority backups suspected of containing malware receive more thorough scanning, while lower-priority backups receive lighter scanning or are skipped entirely, allowing the system to allocate detection resources locally where they are most needed rather than uniformly across all backups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If backup copies are restored without verification, then recovery speed is maximized, but risk of reintroducing malware increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery speedVSAvoidmalware reintroduction risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning and verification of backup copies before restoration occurs. By detecting malware and classifying backups as anomalous or clean in advance, the system ensures that only verified clean backups are selected for restoration, eliminating the need for post-restoration cleaning and preventing malware reintroduction while maintaining efficient recovery speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by proactively detecting and flagging infected backup copies before they can be restored. The anomaly detection and pattern recognition processes identify malware presence in advance, allowing the system to prevent restoration of contaminated backups and counteract the potential harmful effect of malware reintroduction before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Measurement precision

If automated pattern matching is implemented across multiple machines, then recovery prioritization accuracy is improved, but system complexity and algorithm training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprioritization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses pattern matching that can be replicated and applied across multiple machines using the same trained algorithms. Once the anomaly detection patterns are learned from initial data, they can be copied and applied uniformly across the entire fleet of machines, achieving consistent prioritization accuracy without requiring complex custom analysis for each individual machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal pattern matching system that serves multiple functions: detecting anomalies in backup data, prioritizing recovery nodes, and identifying infection patterns across different machines. The same core algorithm and pattern recognition engine handle all these tasks, reducing overall system complexity by using a single multi-functional approach rather than separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240037224A1Anomaly detection
Publication Date: 2024.02.01 PREDATAR LTD
  • US20240037224A1 patent drawing
  • US20240037224A1 patent drawing
  • US20240037224A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a method for detecting a suspected infection event, the method comprising: receiving data associated with back-up copies of a plurality of machines including at least a first machine and a second machine, in which the data is indicative of a size of the associated back-up copy; and determining whether to classify data associated with at least one back-up copy associated with at least a second machine as anomalous based on an anomalous pattern identified in data associated with a back-up copy associated with a first machine.