Frusto-Conical Baffle Ports for Firearm Suppressor Noise and Heat

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional firearm suppressors face issues with system heating, excessive combustion gas venting, and hearing protection, particularly in coaxial chambered designs that compromise on weight, strength, and component complexity.

Innovation Solution

The use of biconvex or lens-shaped ports on the peripheral edge of frusto-conical baffles in a cylindrical housing, which facilitates high-velocity gas flow and turbulence, reducing sound pressure and heat generation without the need for extraneous walls or complex coaxial chambers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If coaxial chambered designs are used to reduce sound pressure, then noise suppression is improved, but system weight and heat generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise suppressionVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful coaxial chamber structure from the suppressor design. By eliminating the extraneous walls and coaxial chambers, the design reduces system weight while maintaining noise suppression through alternative means (baffle ports and turbulence generation).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific port geometries (biconvex, kidney-bean shaped, teardrop shaped) at critical locations on the baffles. These localized port designs generate turbulence and reduce sound pressure without requiring the complex coaxial chamber structure throughout the entire suppressor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If coaxial chambered designs are used to reduce sound pressure, then noise suppression is improved, but system heating increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise suppressionVSAvoidsystem heating
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the extraneous walls and coaxial chambers that trap heat within the suppressor. By extracting these heat-trapping structures, the design allows for better heat dissipation while maintaining noise suppression through the baffle port system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses locally optimized port geometries on the baffles that generate turbulence to reduce sound pressure without creating the heat-trapping coaxial chamber environment. The ports are strategically positioned and shaped to achieve noise reduction without the associated thermal problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If conventional baffle porting is used to reduce weight, then system weight is reduced, but sound pressure reduction is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem weightVSAvoidsound pressure reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing specific port geometries (biconvex, kidney-bean shaped, teardrop shaped) at critical locations on the baffles. These localized port designs generate turbulence and reduce sound pressure more effectively than conventional porting, achieving better noise suppression without adding significant weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the baffle ports from conventional circular or rectangular shapes to optimized curves (biconvex, kidney-bean, teardrop). These parameter changes in port geometry create more effective turbulence and sound pressure reduction while maintaining lightweight construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If simple baffle design is used to reduce complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but hearing protection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent complexityVSAvoidhearing protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses local quality by implementing specific port geometries at critical locations on the baffles. This approach provides effective hearing protection through localized turbulence generation rather than requiring complex coaxial chambers and extraneous walls throughout the entire suppressor structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the baffle ports to optimized shapes that generate effective turbulence for hearing protection. These parameter changes in port geometry provide superior noise reduction compared to simple conventional porting, achieving better hearing protection without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves significant sound pressure reduction and improved shooter hearing protection while minimizing system weight and heat soaking, outperforming coaxial chambered suppressors in terms of noise suppression and durability.

Implementation Method 1

The baffles provided support welded suppressors, as well as welded tubeless suppressors... biconvex or lens-shaped ports on the peripheral edge of frusto-conical baffles... which facilitates high-velocity gas flow and turbulence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS11561059B2Firearm sound suppressor baffles
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 REIS GREEN AUSTIN
  • US11561059B2 patent drawing
  • US11561059B2 patent drawing
  • US11561059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A baffle for silencers which are adapted to reduce system heating, better protect shooter hearing, and reduce the amount of combustion gas vented in the shooters face and eyes during the use of gas operated, self-loading firearms.