Bag Head Forming Apparatus With Independent Motor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing apparatuses for forming the head of bags for alimentary pasta and granular products are complex and inefficient, requiring a single motor to operate multiple mechanisms, leading to a more complicated and slower packaging process.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus employs independent electric motors and connecting rod transmissions to control the formation and deflation of the bag head, allowing for quick and precise motor control, with separate motors for forming, displacing spears, and deflating the bag, reducing complexity and increasing production efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single motor is used to operate all mechanisms for forming the bag head, then the device complexity is reduced, but the productivity and response speed deteriorate due to the complicated and slower packaging process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor control system complexityVSAvoidbag production rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the motor control system into three independent motors (12, 16, 22), each controlling a specific function: motor 12 controls the spears for forming, motor 16 controls the displacement mechanism, and motor 22 controls the press for deflating. This segmentation allows each motor to operate independently and simultaneously, eliminating the sequential operations required by a single motor system, thereby increasing productivity while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If a single motor controls all forming mechanisms, then the ease of operation is improved, but the response speed and precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor control operationVSAvoidresponse speed to motor control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the control system into three independent motors, each motor can be optimized for its specific function with dedicated control circuits, achieving both ease of operation (each motor controls one function) and high response speed (simultaneous independent operation without sequential delays).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connecting rod transmissions are pre-configured in the mechanical structure to convert rotational motion into the required linear motion for each mechanism. This preliminary mechanical arrangement ensures that when each motor activates, the motion is immediately and precisely transmitted to the corresponding component (spears, displacement mechanism, or press), achieving quick and accurate response without requiring complex electronic control sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If complex transmission mechanisms are used to coordinate multiple functions, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebag formation precisionVSAvoidtransmission system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the transmission system into three simple connecting rod mechanisms, each dedicated to one motor's output transmission. This avoids the need for a single complex transmission system that would require intricate coordination, while still achieving precise control through simple, reliable mechanical linkages that are easier to manufacture and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex electronic control and coordination systems with simple mechanical connecting rod transmissions. The mechanical linkage inherently provides the necessary motion transformation and coordination through its physical structure, eliminating the need for complex electronic sensors, controllers, and software algorithms that would increase device complexity while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3339196B1Apparatus for forming the head of bags for foods
Publication Date: 2020.04.22 CYBORGLINE SA
  • EP3339196B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3339196B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3339196B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus for forming the head (1) of a bag (2) for foods is described. The apparatus comprises a press (20) for deflating the head of the bag and a pair of spears (11) for forming the head of the bag, a first electric motor (22) for moving the press and a second electric motor (12) for moving said pair of spears to form the head of the bag.